2011 IEEE International Conference on Web Services 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icws.2011.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composing Non-functional Concerns in Composite Web Services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this work does not show if and how the generated security configurations are associated to external services. Another relevant initiative in the security automation area is Schmeling [31]. This initiative has three important contributions: (1) proposition of an approach for the composition of non-functional concerns in composite Web services; (2) presentation of a toolset supporting this approach; and (3) development of a runtime architecture for realizing the modeled specification.…”
Section: Translation Of Security-aware Business Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this work does not show if and how the generated security configurations are associated to external services. Another relevant initiative in the security automation area is Schmeling [31]. This initiative has three important contributions: (1) proposition of an approach for the composition of non-functional concerns in composite Web services; (2) presentation of a toolset supporting this approach; and (3) development of a runtime architecture for realizing the modeled specification.…”
Section: Translation Of Security-aware Business Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related work already focus on related issues such as: specification of security requirements [2,8,19,21,26,28,[34][35][36], translation of high-level security requirements into security executable configurations [21,31,36], translation of the functional business process into an executable process [24,25] and security enforcement [7,9,12,37]. However, there is a lack of a holistic environment that integrates all the aforementioned points, which includes not only the security modeling, translation and enforcement, but also the functional business process automation in the same approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we provide an overview of the NFComp approach [11,12] for composing non-functional concerns in business processes. NFComp is a modeldriven approach for concern composition that superposes non-functional concerns (NFCs), such as security, performance, or transactional behavior, into finegrained non-functional actions (NFAs).…”
Section: Composing Non-functional Concerns For Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on the technical realization through the composition of individual actions, regarding distinct security properties. The actions and their compositions are then combined with the base process model using the NFComp modeling framework [11]. This generic framework covers the life cycle of non-functional concerns from modeling to execution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Chollet et al [7] defines a proposal to associate non-functional quality properties (security properties) to functional activities in a web service composition model. Schmeling et al [21] present an approach and also a toolset for specifying and implementing non-functional concerns in web service compositions. Non-functional concerns are modelled and then related to a service composition represented in a BPMN diagram.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%