2020
DOI: 10.3866/pku.whxb202008090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite Anodes for Lithium Metal Batteries

Abstract: The applications of lithium-ion batteries have been limited because their energy density can no longer meet the requirements of an emerging energy society. Lithium metal batteries (LMBs) are being considered as potential candidate for nextgeneration energy storage systems owing to the high theoretical specific capacity and low electrochemical potential of lithium metal. However, the commercialization of LMB is limited due to several challenges, such as uncontrollable formation of dendrites, unstable solid elec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to now, various strategies have been proposed to address these hazardous issues involved in Li metal anodes, including adjusting electrolyte compositions, , constructing artificial SEI layers, utilizing solid-state electrolytes (SSEs), and designing 3D micro/nanostructure of Li hosts. Great progress on technical aspects has been achieved in prolonging the lifespan of Li metal anodes. However, the lithiophobic nature of the electrode materials (typically carbon and copper) and large volume change during Li plating/stripping still pose a huge challenge for effectively avoiding lithium dendrites growth. Considering that the final Li deposition morphology critically depends on the nucleation process, numerous lithiophilic seeds, such as doped carbon, metal, and metal oxide nanoparticles, , were utilized to direct smooth Li nucleation and deposition. Although the nucleation barrier can be largely reduced during initial cycles, the deformation and pulverization of these lithiophilic sites or nanoparticles will undoubtedly cause the loss of seeding function, leading to the dendritic Li deposition with cycling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, various strategies have been proposed to address these hazardous issues involved in Li metal anodes, including adjusting electrolyte compositions, , constructing artificial SEI layers, utilizing solid-state electrolytes (SSEs), and designing 3D micro/nanostructure of Li hosts. Great progress on technical aspects has been achieved in prolonging the lifespan of Li metal anodes. However, the lithiophobic nature of the electrode materials (typically carbon and copper) and large volume change during Li plating/stripping still pose a huge challenge for effectively avoiding lithium dendrites growth. Considering that the final Li deposition morphology critically depends on the nucleation process, numerous lithiophilic seeds, such as doped carbon, metal, and metal oxide nanoparticles, , were utilized to direct smooth Li nucleation and deposition. Although the nucleation barrier can be largely reduced during initial cycles, the deformation and pulverization of these lithiophilic sites or nanoparticles will undoubtedly cause the loss of seeding function, leading to the dendritic Li deposition with cycling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the volume fluctuation derived from continuous Li plating/stripping on planar current collector should be also took into account, especially in the practical pouch cells [ 19 ]. Therefore, it can be concluded that designing porous structures as both hosts and current collectors for accommodating Li deposits and buffering its volumetric change is essential for anode-free Li metal batteries [ 20 , 21 ]. Diverse metallic scaffolds with different porosity have been introduced to reduce the local current density [ 22 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9−11 Unfortunately, the 3D frameworks, especially copper foil and carbon-based materials, have poor affinity with lithium metal, resulting in uneven Li deposition. 12,13 One effective approach is to introduce lithiophilic materials, such as Ag, NiO, ZnO, or Cu 2 O, to the surface of current collectors to guide uniform Li nucleation and deposition by reducing nucleation overpotential. 14−17 Besides, optimization of the interfaces between Li and electrolyte via employing electrolyte additives, building an artificial SEI, or using solid-state electrolytes can enhance the mechanical properties and stability of SEI layers to suppress Li dendrite growth.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, diverse strategies have been proposed to address the challenges facing Li metal batteries. Among them, the use of a stable three-dimensional (3D) framework such as GN@Cu foam, 3D Cu mesh, and MXene is found to effectively decrease local current density and regulate the surface energy. Unfortunately, the 3D frameworks, especially copper foil and carbon-based materials, have poor affinity with lithium metal, resulting in uneven Li deposition. , One effective approach is to introduce lithiophilic materials, such as Ag, NiO, ZnO, or Cu 2 O, to the surface of current collectors to guide uniform Li nucleation and deposition by reducing nucleation overpotential. Besides, optimization of the interfaces between Li and electrolyte via employing electrolyte additives, building an artificial SEI, or using solid-state electrolytes can enhance the mechanical properties and stability of SEI layers to suppress Li dendrite growth. However, the construction of a 3D framework and artificial synthesis of SEI generally require complicated procedures such as dealloying, templating, and coating, which unfavor scalable processing of a lithium metal anode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%