2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2017.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite journal rankings in library and information science: A factor analytic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for the SJR_Hindex , these variables all include a reputational component (Table 7), since they are either weighted ( JCR_NEF , JCR_IS and SJR ) or stated preference ( ABS , ABDC ) metrics. [13] Our results thus echo the conclusions of Walters (2017a) who highlights a difference between unweighted citation metrics and weighted/stated preference metrics when assessing research impact. Our results also echo Ballas and Theoharakis (2003) who contend that two types of studies are carried out to evaluate journal standing – citation analyses and perceptual ranking/rating studies.…”
Section: Accounting and The Environment – An Analysis Of Management S...supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Except for the SJR_Hindex , these variables all include a reputational component (Table 7), since they are either weighted ( JCR_NEF , JCR_IS and SJR ) or stated preference ( ABS , ABDC ) metrics. [13] Our results thus echo the conclusions of Walters (2017a) who highlights a difference between unweighted citation metrics and weighted/stated preference metrics when assessing research impact. Our results also echo Ballas and Theoharakis (2003) who contend that two types of studies are carried out to evaluate journal standing – citation analyses and perceptual ranking/rating studies.…”
Section: Accounting and The Environment – An Analysis Of Management S...supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Our second analysis focuses on quantitative metrics related to scientific academic journals which are more and more “metricized” and have been used for nearly a century to, among other purposes, assess the changes in impact over time (Mingers and Yang, 2017; Walters, 2017a). However, there is still scarce and limited information about the correlations among all these indicators and rankings, especially in the field of business and management science (Villaseñor-Almaraz et al , 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%