2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite modelling of subaerial landslide–tsunamis in different water body geometries and novel insight into slide and wave kinematics

Abstract: A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.For more information, please contact eprints@nottingham.ac.uk 05.01.2016, accepted for publication in Coastal Engineering 109(3), 20-41 (doi:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More detailed physical insight into selected tests of this study, including forces on the slide surface and wave kinematics, will be presented in Heller et al (2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More detailed physical insight into selected tests of this study, including forces on the slide surface and wave kinematics, will be presented in Heller et al (2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This required the acquisition of key physical parameters including surface elevation, pressures on the slide front face, particle image velocimetry (PIV) and slide kinematics. The data analysis and interpretation presented herein focuses on surface elevation and slide kinematics, with slide pressures and PIV data being reported in Heller et al (2015).…”
Section: Measurement Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…have developed empirical models from laboratory simulations and/or field data of avalanche and landslide generated waves (e.g., Kamphuis and Bowering, 1970;Voight, 1979 and1982;Fritz et al, 2004;Heller and Hager, 2010), but many of the laboratory models use simplified geometries (Heller et al, 2016). Numerical simulations of slide-generated waves have been primarily focused on two-dimensional simulations and simple arrangements (e.g., Rzadkierwicz et al, 1997;Zweifel et al, 2007;Biscarini, 2010;Cremonesi et al, 2011;Ataie-5 Ashtiani et al, 2011;Ghozlani et al, 2013); but, the two-dimensional shallow water equations (SWE) may not be appropriate for slide-generated waves because of the role that vertical accelerations play in the wave dynamics (Heinrich, 1992;Zweifel et al, 2007).…”
Section: Impulse Waves Generated From Avalanches and Landslidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulations of slide-generated waves have been primarily focused on two-dimensional simulations and simple arrangements (e.g., Rzadkierwicz et al, 1997;Zweifel et al, 2007;Biscarini, 2010;Cremonesi et al, 2011;Ataie-5 Ashtiani et al, 2011;Ghozlani et al, 2013); but, the two-dimensional shallow water equations (SWE) may not be appropriate for slide-generated waves because of the role that vertical accelerations play in the wave dynamics (Heinrich, 1992;Zweifel et al, 2007). Recent developments in numerical simulations of landslide-generated waves include simulation of multi-phase flows, including a three-dimensional Navier-Stokes Volume of Fluid model (Abadie et al, 2010), a two-phase debris flow model (Kafle et al, 2016), and the application of Smoothed Particle 10 Hydrodynamics (SPH) models (Heller et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2016). However, these studies still focus on simple cases and geometries rather than real-world scenarios.…”
Section: Impulse Waves Generated From Avalanches and Landslidesmentioning
confidence: 99%