DOI: 10.31274/etd-180810-3471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composition and quality characteristics of carcasses from pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake on high or low energy diets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1
1

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(127 reference statements)
0
6
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is consistent with a previous report of significant negative correlations of lipid content and star probe values when ultimate pH is between 5.5 and 5.8 . However, a review of the literature reveals mixed results regarding the contributions of marbling and lipid content to pork tenderness (Rincker et al, 2008;Arkfeld et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation is consistent with a previous report of significant negative correlations of lipid content and star probe values when ultimate pH is between 5.5 and 5.8 . However, a review of the literature reveals mixed results regarding the contributions of marbling and lipid content to pork tenderness (Rincker et al, 2008;Arkfeld et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenotypic comparisons of growth, feed efficiency and carcass composition performances have already been reported in the literature for pigs fed with diets with different energy and dietary fibre contents (Quiniou and Noblet, 2012;Sevillano et al, 2018). Only few studies reported the effect of high-fibre (HF) diets on meat quality traits (Arkfeld et al, 2015). If feeding pigs with diets containing more dietary fibres generally impacts the phenotypic mean of most production traits, a major concern would be to identify whether a genetic by feed (G × F) interaction exists for those traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of RFI line on Hunter L, a, and b values in this study showed Hunter L values were lesser, Hunter a values were not different from, and Hunter b values were lesser for chops from LRFI pigs than HRFI pigs. Lightness values of LM chops were not different between RFI lines from ISU generations 5, 8, or 9 Arkfeld et al, 2015), but INRA studies showed LM chops from generations 4 and 6 LRFI pigs were lighter than HRFI pigs . Hunter a values of ISU studies were not different or were greater in loin chops from HRFI pigs , whereas Hunter a values in INRA studies were either not different between genetic line or were greater from loin chops from LRFI pigs (Faure et al, 2015).…”
Section: Carcass Composition and Pork Qualitymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Hunter b values in loin chops from previous ISU RFI generations have not been as consistent as other traits. Hunter b values have either tended be greater for LRFI pigs or were greater for HRFI (Arkfeld et al, 2015). Hunter b values in INRA studies tended to be greater or were greater in loin chops from LRFI pigs compared to HRFI counterparts.…”
Section: Carcass Composition and Pork Qualitymentioning
confidence: 95%