1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00640371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composition of cometary dust: The case against silicates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2006) mass composition [Silicates : organics : carbonaceous: ices ] = [0.26:0.23:0.086: 0.426] suggests refractory silicates to be the most important nonice component. Mendis (1975) give L = 2.30 × 10 10 erg/g for silicates, which is close to that of water ice, while organics will lower the mean slightly. Chyba et al (1993) adopted 2.3 × 10 10 erg/g for comets, 5 × 10 10 erg/g for carbonaceous and 8 × 10 10 erg/g for stone/iron bodies and just 10 11 erg/g even for solid iron.…”
Section: Latent Heat Of Sublimationsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2006) mass composition [Silicates : organics : carbonaceous: ices ] = [0.26:0.23:0.086: 0.426] suggests refractory silicates to be the most important nonice component. Mendis (1975) give L = 2.30 × 10 10 erg/g for silicates, which is close to that of water ice, while organics will lower the mean slightly. Chyba et al (1993) adopted 2.3 × 10 10 erg/g for comets, 5 × 10 10 erg/g for carbonaceous and 8 × 10 10 erg/g for stone/iron bodies and just 10 11 erg/g even for solid iron.…”
Section: Latent Heat Of Sublimationsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…However, in situations of intense ablation and explosion, all components are eventually vaporized and the relevant value is the weighted mean over all mass components, including volatile and refractory ones. Sekanina (2003) Mendis (1975) give L = 2.30 × 10 10 erg/g for silicates, which is close to that of water ice, while organics will lower the mean slightly. Chyba et al (1993) adopted 2.3 × 10 10 erg/g for comets, 5 × 10 10 erg/g for carbonaceous and 8 × 10 10 erg/g for stone/iron bodies and just 10 11 erg/g even for solid iron.…”
Section: Latent Heat Of Sublimationmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Equations describing the energy balance at the nucleus surface and their solutions have been given by many authors dating back to Watson et al (1963) (see, e.g., Cowan and A 'Hearn 1979;Weissman and Kieffer 1981). The latent heat of sublimation of water ice is very large, about the same as for rock (Mendis and Wickramasinghe 1975;Brown et al 2011). While the equations generally used to compute vapour pressures may not be reliable at relatively high temperatures, volatile sublimation provides an effective cooling mechanism for keeping nucleus temperatures low, despite the extreme proximity to the Sun.…”
Section: Sublimation Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comet Kobayashi-Berger-Milon did not show any 10 ym excess above a blackbody continuum [33]. The 10 ym and 18 ym peaks are generally attributed to silicate particles, although formaldehyde polymers have been suggested [34,35]. The presence of the peaks sets an upper limit of a few microns on the size of the emitting grains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%