2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.06.176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composition optimization of p-type AgSn m SbTe m +2 thermoelectric materials synthesized by mechanical alloying and spark plasma sintering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, when more AgBiTe 2 is involved, the band gap of SnTe becomes smaller (see the discussion below), which would probably decrease the defect formation energy and increase the Sn vacancies, contributing to increased hole densities. A comparison of the hole concentrations of AgSn x BiTe x+2 and AgSn m SbTe m+2 , 16 Fig. 2(a), clearly shows that the former has much lower hole concentrations than the latter under the same x or m. This indicates that Bi is a more effective electron donor than Sb in SnTe and is consistent with previous ndings in other II-VI systems.…”
Section: Physical Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, when more AgBiTe 2 is involved, the band gap of SnTe becomes smaller (see the discussion below), which would probably decrease the defect formation energy and increase the Sn vacancies, contributing to increased hole densities. A comparison of the hole concentrations of AgSn x BiTe x+2 and AgSn m SbTe m+2 , 16 Fig. 2(a), clearly shows that the former has much lower hole concentrations than the latter under the same x or m. This indicates that Bi is a more effective electron donor than Sb in SnTe and is consistent with previous ndings in other II-VI systems.…”
Section: Physical Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…11 It was previously reported that by alloying a proper amount of AgSbTe 2 with SnTe, creating the quaternary system AgSn m SbTe m+2 , the hole concentration of SnTe can be reduced (not by Hall measurements) as evidenced by the variation of the Seebeck coefficient as a function of m. 8 The most recent study of this system by Xing et al, however, pointed towards an opposite direction that the hole concentration of SnTe increases with increasing AgSbTe 2 although curiously the Seebeck coefficient also increases in this process. 16 These results suggest that the introduction of AgSbTe 2 warrants additional investigations regarding its role in affecting the hole population of SnTe. Despite this, the presence of AgSbTe 2 in SnTe can greatly decrease the lattice thermal conductivity of SnTe by the nanostructure scattering of phonons 8,17,18 (the AgSn m SbTe m+2 system (TAST) is a nanostructured composite 17,18 ) similar to the AgPb m SbTe m+2 system (LAST).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the measured work function of SnTe as ∼5 eV and the reported value of work function of Te as ∼4.95 eV, , the dispersed SnTe/Te interfaces (typical energy barrier of ∼0.05 eV) may act like energy filtering centers in SnTe and contribute to more enhancement of the Seebeck coefficient. Such energy filtering of the charge carrier-induced enhancement of the Seebeck coefficient is earlier reported for Sn 1– x Sb x Te and AgSbTe 2 –SnTe alloys . Along with energy filtering, the other possibility of such an enhanced Seebeck coefficient could be the high carrier concentration in Te/SnTe samples, which suggests that in this sample, the Fermi level is deep below the valence band edge, and the heavy valence band also contributes to the Seebeck coefficient.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Such energy filtering of the charge carrier-induced enhancement of the Seebeck coefficient is earlier reported for Sn 1−x Sb x Te 26 and AgSbTe 2 −SnTe alloys. 27 Along with energy filtering, the other possibility of such an enhanced Seebeck coefficient could be the high carrier concentration in Te/SnTe samples, which suggests that in this sample, the Fermi level is deep below the valence band edge, and the heavy valence band also contributes to the Seebeck coefficient. The systematic enhancement of the effective mass (m*) from 0.17m e (for SnTe) to 2.42m e (for Sn 0.7 Te) with the decrease of x in the Sn x Te sample supports the increasing contribution of the heavy valence band (details given in the Supporting Information S6).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%