2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compositional disparity in Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) thin film deposited by RF-sputtering from a single quaternary compound target

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to its remarkable properties such as earth-abundant and non-toxic elements, optimal optical bandgap (1.0–1.5 eV), excellent absorption coefficients (>10 4 cm −1 ) [ 1 , 2 ], and desirable electrical properties, the CZTS has become an ideal absorber for thin-film-based photovoltaic applications. Currently, various fabrication techniques are being used to deposit kesterite thin films, including atom beam sputtering [ 3 ], hybrid sputtering [ 4 ], radiofrequency magnetron sputtering [ 5 ], co-evaporation [ 6 ], electron-beam-evaporated [ 7 ], electrodeposition [ 8 ], sol-gel [ 9 ], spray pyrolysis [ 10 ], and molecular ink techniques [ 11 ]. These processes involve either costly vacuum equipment or toxic, hazardous, and explosive solvents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to its remarkable properties such as earth-abundant and non-toxic elements, optimal optical bandgap (1.0–1.5 eV), excellent absorption coefficients (>10 4 cm −1 ) [ 1 , 2 ], and desirable electrical properties, the CZTS has become an ideal absorber for thin-film-based photovoltaic applications. Currently, various fabrication techniques are being used to deposit kesterite thin films, including atom beam sputtering [ 3 ], hybrid sputtering [ 4 ], radiofrequency magnetron sputtering [ 5 ], co-evaporation [ 6 ], electron-beam-evaporated [ 7 ], electrodeposition [ 8 ], sol-gel [ 9 ], spray pyrolysis [ 10 ], and molecular ink techniques [ 11 ]. These processes involve either costly vacuum equipment or toxic, hazardous, and explosive solvents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the synthesized CZNS, WO 3 , and G-CZNS@W. The three dominant peaks (112), (220), and (312) are attributed to the CZNS kesterite phase, indexed based on the standard JCPDS data (JCPDS card No. 26-0575) 27 . For the WO 3 nanorod, it was evident that all the sharp diffraction peaks could be classified as the monoclinic phase of WO 3 , and the results matched well with the standard JCPDS data (card No.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where q, ε 1 , ε 2 , V bi , V, N A , and N D are the electric charge of an electron, dielectric permittivity of CdS, dielectric permittivity of p-absorber, built-in voltage, applied voltage, acceptor concentration in the p-absorber layer and donor concentration in a CdS buffer layer, respectively. However, a higher J sc value for CBO > 0.3 eV was recorded for CdS of Set D (Figure 5b) despite the reduced depletion width, which was supposed to decrease the photogenerated current according to Equation (8). This could be due to beneficial synergistic effects of high carrier mobility and a narrower depletion region, which enables carriers to overcome a high CBO barrier.…”
Section: ƞ =mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, the scarcity of indium (In) and tellurium (Te) is predicted to hamper the future adoption of CIGS and CdTe at a multi-terawatt level scale [5,6]. Therefore, various earth-abundant, low cost and pure sulfide-based materials such as Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 (CZTS), Cu 2 SnS 3 (CTS), FeS 2 and SnS are being rigorously experimented with as for plausible next generation thin film technologies [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. These aforementioned photo-absorber materials are often adopted in the well-established Mo/absorber/CdS/ZnO substrate type device configuration that was developed by ARCO back in 1988, which was one of the key innovations that catalyzed the development of high efficiency CIGS solar cells [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%