Compositional Hazard Analysis of UML Component and Deployment Models

Giese, Holger; Tichy, Matthias; Schilling, Daniela

doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30138-7_15

Cited by 33 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The systematic hazard analysis applied to the UML component and deployment models [12] is an approach to bring safety and component failure issues to the UML design. In [32] the failure sequence diagrams have been proposed.…”

Section: Safetymentioning

confidence: 99%

A multilayer software architecture for safe autonomous robots

Gribov

Voos

2014

Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper a safety-oriented model based software architecture for robotic solutions is proposed. The main focus herein is to consider aspects such as real-time, heterogeneity, deployment, modeling and analysis of emerging effects as well as functional safety and to combine all aspects into an overall development approach. The architecture shall capture the complexity caused by the autonomy and mobility of the robot and support the developer with a suitable chain of evidence especially suited for the safety relevant functions. A use case comprising a lightweight robotic manipulator which will be integrated in a mobile service robot underlines the feasibility of this approach.

show abstract

Section: Safetymentioning

confidence: 99%

A multilayer software architecture for safe autonomous robots

Gribov

Voos

2014

Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some approaches to hazard analysis address the propagation of failures in component-based systems by matching ingoing and outgoing failures of individual components. In [7,8] UML [17] component diagrams and deployment diagrams support a method for compositional hazard analysis. Fault trees [10] are used to describe hazards and the combination of component failures that can cause them.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Divide and Conquer – Towards a Notion of Risk Model Encapsulation

Refsdal

Rideng

Solhaug

et al. 2014

Engineering Secure Future Internet Services and Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The criticality of risk management is evident when considering the information society of today, and the emergence of Future Internet technologies such as Cloud services. Information systems and services become ever more complex, heterogeneous, dynamic and interoperable, and many different stakeholders increasingly rely on their availability and protection. Managing risks in such a setting is extremely challenging, and existing methods and techniques are often inadequate. A main difficulty is that the overall risk picture becomes too complex to understand without methodic and systematic techniques for how to decompose a large scale risk analysis into smaller parts. In this chapter we introduce a notion of risk model encapsulation to address this challenge. Encapsulation facilitates compositional risk analysis by hiding internal details of a risk model. This is achieved by defining a risk model interface that contains all and only the information that is needed for composing the individual risk models to derive the overall risk picture. The interface takes into account possible dependencies between the risk models. We outline a method for compositional risk analysis, and demonstrate the approach by using an example on information security from the petroleum industry.

show abstract

“…The systematic hazard analysis applied to the UML component and deployment models as proposed in [8] is an approach to integrate safety and component failure issues to UML design.…”

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%