2015
DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compositional stability of boreal understorey vegetation after overstorey harvesting across a riparian ecotone

Abstract: Questions: Understanding factors that contribute to the stability of an ecosystem following harvesting is central to predicting responses of boreal ecosystems to increasing human disturbances. While the response of understorey vegetation to harvesting is well understood for upland sites, little is known about compositional stability of riparian understorey vegetation. We examined how compositional stability changes with or without harvesting along an upland to streamside gradient and tested whether composition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(110 reference statements)
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, changes in species composition (quantified by species turnover; see Supplementary Figure S1) were more driven by colonization than by the process of species loss. These results are different from those of the authors of [34], who found that the boreal understory communities with high species richness improved compositional stability following overstory cutting through less species loss than the communities with low species richness, whereas the number of colonizing species was similar in both species-rich and species-poor communities. In the case of our study, species-rich communities were more densely populated with less empty space, that is, had higher total understory cover (Pearson's correlation coefficient between species richness and total cover: r = 0.63, p < 0.001), thereby preventing potential colonizing species from entering the community after the disturbance.…”
Section: Initial Community Diversity As a Significant Determinant Of contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, changes in species composition (quantified by species turnover; see Supplementary Figure S1) were more driven by colonization than by the process of species loss. These results are different from those of the authors of [34], who found that the boreal understory communities with high species richness improved compositional stability following overstory cutting through less species loss than the communities with low species richness, whereas the number of colonizing species was similar in both species-rich and species-poor communities. In the case of our study, species-rich communities were more densely populated with less empty space, that is, had higher total understory cover (Pearson's correlation coefficient between species richness and total cover: r = 0.63, p < 0.001), thereby preventing potential colonizing species from entering the community after the disturbance.…”
Section: Initial Community Diversity As a Significant Determinant Of contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…For each plot, compositional shift was measured as the Euclidean distance (vector length) between the two points, that is, pre-treatment and post-treatment position of sample unit (plot) in the NMDS ordination space. Compositional resistance and stability are inversely related to the Euclidean distance: resistance is maximal when the sample unit maintains its initial position in ordination space, that is, the Euclidean distance equals 0 [34]. For the trait-based analysis, we also calculated the Euclidean distance (from sample scores) between the initial and post-treatment position of each plot in the PCA ordination space.…”
Section: Data Processing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is an important drawback, since both the stability of ecosystem functions and of ecosystem structure and composition can be important aspects in terms of management planning and policy making for complex ecosystems, especially if several types of habitats exist and ecotone dynamics can change (MacDonald et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, studies rarely investigated the impact of disturbances on the stability of ecosystem function and of biodiversity together (but see Steudel et al 2012). This is an important drawback, since both the stability of ecosystem functions and of ecosystem structure and composition can be important aspects in terms of management planning and policy making for complex ecosystems, especially if several types of habitats exist and ecotone dynamics can change (MacDonald et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%