“…Many efforts, e.g., superlattice-like (SLL) (Chong et al, 2006;Lu et al, 2012;Chia Tan et al, 2013) and superlattice (SL) (Simpson et al, 2011;Soeya et al, 2013;Takaura et al, 2014) PCM architectures, have been made to address the issue of limited endurance, attempting to tailor the 3D phase transitions into 2D fashion. However, both schemes encounter difficulties in maintaining a reliable 2D structural transformation upon repeated programming, because the RESET operations must be cautiously performed to avoid local overheating; otherwise the multilayers may melt together and then quench into a mixed amorphous phase (Simpson et al, 2011;Li et al, 2018), as the melting temperatures (T m , being ∼900-1,000 K) of the adopted PCMs in SLL or SL architectures are quite close (Chong et al, 2006;Simpson et al, 2011;Lu et al, 2012;Chia Tan et al, 2013;Soeya et al, 2013;Takaura et al, 2014). In addition, the growth condition must be tightly controlled to construct Ge(Sn)Te/Sb 2 Te 3 SLs as Ge(Sn)Te is chemically reactive and may alloy into Ge(Sn)SbTe-like compounds easily during synthesis (Li et al, 2018).…”