2016
DOI: 10.19026/ajfst.11.2356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Academic Quality of Food Journals Based on Rough Set and Neural Networ

Abstract: In order to evaluate food journals efficiently and reasonably, this study puts forward a comprehensive evaluation model for academic quality of food journals based on rough set and neural network. Firstly, we reduce evaluation indicators of journals based on discernibility matrix in rough set theory, removing the miscellaneous indicators and form the core evaluation indicator system, so as to have a more effective training for BP neural network. Then, we use methods defined in our study to generate enough trai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality on the Line evaluation criteria based on Internet distance learning: the evaluation standard includes seven first-level indicators, namely, architecture, curriculum development, teaching and learning, curriculum structure, student support system, teacher support system, and evaluation and evaluation system [8,9]. In addition, the first-level indexes are divided into two parts: the necessary indexes for each online course evaluation and the optional indexes that can be independently selected and expressed according to different evaluation needs, which are further refined into 24 second-level necessary indexes and 21 second-level optional indexes [10,11], so as to make the evaluation standard more flexible and instructive. At the same time, it also provides a case study report on the evaluation of online courses in six schools using this evaluation standard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality on the Line evaluation criteria based on Internet distance learning: the evaluation standard includes seven first-level indicators, namely, architecture, curriculum development, teaching and learning, curriculum structure, student support system, teacher support system, and evaluation and evaluation system [8,9]. In addition, the first-level indexes are divided into two parts: the necessary indexes for each online course evaluation and the optional indexes that can be independently selected and expressed according to different evaluation needs, which are further refined into 24 second-level necessary indexes and 21 second-level optional indexes [10,11], so as to make the evaluation standard more flexible and instructive. At the same time, it also provides a case study report on the evaluation of online courses in six schools using this evaluation standard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%