2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.05.001
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive evaluation of untargeted metabolomics data processing software in feature detection, quantification and discriminating marker selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
111
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As anticipated, we observed significant feature inflation in this mixture of 51 NP standards: 869 signals from PI and NI acquisition modes were detected (Figure 2). This approximately 95% feature inflation is consistent with a previous report of 10 000-30 000 features detected after injection of 900 unique metabolites 33 and with a study that used isotope labeling as a feature filtering approach 11 . Blank ratio filtering deleted 50% of the features and the other generic filters described above removed 15% of the remaining ones.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As anticipated, we observed significant feature inflation in this mixture of 51 NP standards: 869 signals from PI and NI acquisition modes were detected (Figure 2). This approximately 95% feature inflation is consistent with a previous report of 10 000-30 000 features detected after injection of 900 unique metabolites 33 and with a study that used isotope labeling as a feature filtering approach 11 . Blank ratio filtering deleted 50% of the features and the other generic filters described above removed 15% of the remaining ones.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We demonstrate here that feature degeneracy - the ocean of data - has a great impact on the final annotated peak list information, thus impacting the biological knowledge mined from untargeted metabolomic studies. We estimate, based on analysis of standard mixtures, that feature inflation is close to 95%, in agreement with other studies 33,11 . Our package MS-CleanR, with its a point-and-click software on a Shiny interface, is a new component in the suite of tools comprising the GUI software MS-DIAL and the annotation capabilities of MS-FINDER which altogether provide a comprehensive workflow, from raw data to final annotated peaklist.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Metabolomic analyses can be separated into targeted or untargeted approaches. A targeted metabolomic analysis investigates quantitative changes of predetermined metabolites using analytical standards, while an untargeted approach measures any metabolite above the detection limit within the metabolomic profile . Untargeted metabolomics has been used extensively for biomarker discovery and identification of disease‐related metabolic pathways.…”
Section: Investigating the Gut Microbiome With Metabolomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there exists a wide array of tools, they all produce very different results. For instance, in a recent study, where the authors evaluated five software on a benchmarked standard and common dataset (MS‐Dial, MZmine 2, XCMS, MarkerView, and Compound Discoverer), they reported various advantages and disadvantages of each of these tools in the detection of true features derived from compounds in the mixture . Various obstacles and corrective measures available in four major aspects associated with an untargeted MS‐based metabolomics experiment—(1) experimental design, (2) preanalytical (sample collection and preparation), (3) analytical (chromatography and detection), and (4) postanalytical (data processing)—have been discussed elsewhere .…”
Section: Tools For Analytical Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%