Hydraulic stimulation operations for enhanced geothermal systems (EGSs), petroleum applications, and wastewater disposal wells are potential sources of seismic hazards. In many places, the high-pressure and/ or massive volume of injections has led to an increase in the frequency and magnitude of earthquakes (Bao & Eaton, 2016;Ellsworth, 2013;Frohlich, 2012). Presently, predictions of seismic hazards from injections remain difficult, and determinations of the causality of earthquakes located at a large distance (>10 km) from injection locations are particularly arduous (Goebel et al., 2017;Keranen et al., 2014).The possible underpinning mechanisms remain under debate. Injection-induced seismicity is frequently explained by the pore pressure increase within the rock mass connected with the injection well. This zone can be referred to as the "pressurized zone," and it can be illuminated by active seismic measurements during high-pressure fluid injections (Calò et al., 2011;Schopper et al., 2020), as the relative change in p-wave velocity is directly linked to pore pressure changes. These pore pressure changes can lead to fault ruptures, and if the energy at the fracture tip overcomes the tensile strength of the rock, new fractures can be created.Within the pressurized zone, in the near-field of the injection site, the pore pressure distribution is dominated by fluid flow along a pressure gradient, that is, pressure diffusion. However, the time scale for diffusion-induced pore pressure changes is too slow to explain rapid far-field pressure changes and remotely induced seismic events. One hypothesis explaining remote seismicity is that such activity might be associated with aseismic slip processes. Aseismic slip has been observed in-situ in response to fluid injection (Guglielmi et al., 2015) and can potentially extend beyond the pressurized zone (Bhattacharya & Viesca, 2019). An alternative hypothesis involves poroelastic processes, which can be used to explain pressure changes caused by rock deformation and associated pore space variations reaching beyond the pressurized zone (Jacqey Abstract High-pressure fluid injections cause transient pore pressure changes over large distances, which may induce seismicity. The zone of influence for such an injection was studied at high spatial resolutions in six decameter-scaled fluid injection experiments in crystalline rock. Pore pressure time series revealed two distinct responses based on the lag time and magnitude of pressure change, namely, a near-and far-field response. The near-field response is due to pressure diffusion. In the far-field, the fast response time and decay of pressure changes are produced by effective stress changes in the anisotropic stress field. Our experiments confirm that fracture fluid pressure perturbations around the injection point are not limited to the near field and can extend beyond the pressurized zone.
Plain Language SummaryThe far-field pore pressure response in geological reservoirs due to high pressure fluid injection is not clarified y...