2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2016.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (C i PA): Pending issues for successful validation and implementation

Abstract: In order to advance the CiPA paradigm from the current testing and validation stages to a research and regulatory drug development strategy, systematic guidance by CiPA stakeholders is necessary to expedite solutions to pending and newly arising issues. Once a study protocol is proved to yield robust and reproducible results within and across laboratories, it can be implemented as qualified regulatory procedure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last few years, the comprehensive in vitro proarrythmia assay (CiPA) initiative has been advocating the in vitro assessment of multiple cardiac ion currents and the estimation of the combined effect of multiple ionic channel inhibition using cardiomyocyte cell-based quantitative systems models (17,18). However, the primary focus of the CiPA has been on the parent drug, specifically at the single cardiac cell level (19). Assessment of the QT prolongation liability of a drug based only on the parent drug and the hERG-centric evaluations could be misleading since many drugs such as CT affect not only I Kr but also other ionic currents and may have electrophysiologically active metabolites (14,20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few years, the comprehensive in vitro proarrythmia assay (CiPA) initiative has been advocating the in vitro assessment of multiple cardiac ion currents and the estimation of the combined effect of multiple ionic channel inhibition using cardiomyocyte cell-based quantitative systems models (17,18). However, the primary focus of the CiPA has been on the parent drug, specifically at the single cardiac cell level (19). Assessment of the QT prolongation liability of a drug based only on the parent drug and the hERG-centric evaluations could be misleading since many drugs such as CT affect not only I Kr but also other ionic currents and may have electrophysiologically active metabolites (14,20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…72 Because it is unclear which aspects of network firing activity (i.e., action potential width, bursting, mean activity, interspike statistics, oscillations) are most important for cognitive function, traditional classifiers or deep-learning approaches could be used to predict what property of simulated activity is associated with human cognition. A similar approach has been followed in the Comprehensive in Vitro ProArrythmia Assay (CiPA) 73 or Consortium for Safety Assessment using hiPSCs, 74 with the objective to develop a predictive model for cardiac safety based on electrophysiological data with human iPSC differentiated into cardiomyocytes.…”
Section: Use Of Qsp In Phenotypical Drug Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional references are provided. [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82]…”
Section: The Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%