Comprehensiveness of Outcome Reporting in Studies of Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee

Makhni, Eric C.; Meyer, Maximilian A.; Saltzman, Bryan M.; Cole, Brian J.

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.009

Cited by 27 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…12,13,24,26 However, patient satisfaction in cartilage repair is seldom reported, and 1 study showed that only 30% of articles from 2010 to 2015 reported on any metrics of patient satisfaction with the surgical procedure. 22 A great number of articles reported the correlation between PROs and satisfaction after total joint replacement. 5,6,11,17,19,25 Unfortunately, the relationship between PROs and satisfaction is seldom reported after cartilage repair procedures.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although patient satisfaction is a critical aspect of care, fewer than one-third of cartilage repair articles published in the top 5 high-impact factor orthopaedic journals reported patient satisfaction metrics, and only a little over half reported general patient satisfaction with the cartilage repair procedure. 22 A relationship between patient satisfaction and outcome is well documented after total knee arthroplasty, with most patients reporting an increase in satisfaction that accompanies an improvement in pain and function. However, the observation of a negative correlation with satisfaction and outcome is not uncommon when patients report low satisfaction with the results of the surgery but have good or excellent clinical outcomes.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Is Patient Satisfaction Associated With Clinical Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee?

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Is Patient Satisfaction Associated With Clinical Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee?

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Postoperative pain has been acknowledged as one domain (out of many) in perioperative medicine [15] but was not further established. For total knee arthroplasty (and for knee replacement or joint replacement), several initiatives work on harmonizing outcome assessment [11,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], by considering effects of surgery and general long-term features without focusing on acute postoperative pain (e.g., knee injury and/or knee osteoarthritis, knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis [16][17][18][19][20][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] or hip or knee osteoarthritis [11,21]). Regarding breast surgery and sternotomy, COS considerations for postoperative pain have not been worked on yet, despite some effort to harmonize outcome assessment in general for reconstructive breast surgery [29,30].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing consensus on core outcome domains and measurement instruments for assessing effectiveness in perioperative pain management after sternotomy, breast cancer surgery, total knee arthroplasty, and surgery related to endometriosis

Kaiser

Liedgens

Meißner

et al. 2020

Trials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Evidence synthesis of clinical trials requires consistent outcome assessment. For pain management after surgery, inconsistency of effectiveness assessment is still observed. A subproject of IMI-PainCare (Innovative Medicine Initiatives, www.imi-paincare.eu) aims for identifying core outcome domains and measurement instruments for postoperative pain in four surgical fields (sternotomy, breast cancer surgery, total knee arthroplasty, and surgery related to endometriosis) in order to harmonize outcome assessment for perioperative pain management. Methods A multifaceted process will be performed according to existing guidelines (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET), COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN)). In a first step, outcome domains will be identified via systematic literature review and consented on during a 1-day consensus meeting by 10 stakeholder groups, including patient representatives, forming an IMI PROMPT consensus panel. In a second step, outcome measurement instruments regarding the beforehand consented core outcome domains and their psychometric properties will be searched for via systematic literature review and approved by COSMIN checklist for study quality and scale quality separately. In a three-step online survey, the IMI PROMPT consensus panel will vote for most suitable measurement instruments. The process is planned to be conducted between 11/2017 (systematic literature review on common outcome domains) and 3/2022 (final voting on core outcome measurement).

show abstract

“…4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 Although the increase in PROMs has helped ensure thoroughness of assessment, important secondary limitations such as a lack of standardization have led to large variability in the PROMs selected to assess health states. 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 Furthermore, each new instrument developed must be evaluated in each population of interest such that acceptable correlational strengths are confirmed. 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance of PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression Computer Adaptive Tests Instruments in Patients Undergoing Meniscal Surgery

Nwachukwu

Patel

et al. 2020

Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To compare the performance of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF), pain interference (PIF), and depression computer adaptive tests (CAT) relative to legacy instruments in patients undergoing meniscal surgery. Methods Patients scheduled to undergo meniscal surgery completed legacy knee function PROMs (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] subscores), Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARS), Veterans-Rand 12 (VR12), Short Form 12 (SF12), and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) alongside PROMIS PF, PIF, and Depression preoperatively. Spearman rank correlations were calculated, and score distributions were examined for floor and ceiling effects. Results 152 patients (46.6 ± 14.9 years, 67.1% male) completed PROMs for appropriate inclusion. PROMIS PF yielded high-moderate to high correlations with the IKDC and KOOS subscales ( r = 0.61 to 0.73), demonstrating similar performance to the IKDC. PROMIS PIF demonstrated moderately high-moderate to high correlations with the IKDC, KOOS subscales, VR-12 Physical Component Score (PCS), and SF12 PCS ( r = 0.62 to 0.71), performing comparably to KOOS Pain ( r = 0.55 to 0.92). PROMIS Depression demonstrated moderate to high-moderate correlations with the mental health legacies ( r = 0.46 to 0.66). Significant ceiling effects were observed for MARS (n = 29, 18.8%), and significant floor effects were exhibited by PROMIS Depression (n = 38, 25%) and MARS (n = 27, 17.6%). Conclusion The PROMIS PF, PIF CAT, and Depression instruments exhibit comparable performance profiles relative to legacy knee PROMs. PROMIS PF and PIF demonstrated no floor and ceiling effects, whereas PROMIS Depression exhibited a significant relative floor effect. PROMIS PF and PIF may be appropriately used to establish functional baselines preoperatively. Level of Evidence IV, diagnostic case series.

show abstract

Comprehensiveness of Outcome Reporting in Studies of Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee

Cited by 27 publications

References 15 publications

Is Patient Satisfaction Associated With Clinical Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee?

Is Patient Satisfaction Associated With Clinical Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee?

Developing consensus on core outcome domains and measurement instruments for assessing effectiveness in perioperative pain management after sternotomy, breast cancer surgery, total knee arthroplasty, and surgery related to endometriosis

Performance of PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression Computer Adaptive Tests Instruments in Patients Undergoing Meniscal Surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About