1991
DOI: 10.1016/0255-2701(91)80007-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressible gas-liquid flow through pipeline restrictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with the two-phase flow results, e.g., by Fr6hlich [6], Schmidt [8,9], Rivas [10], Shannak [11] and Morris [12,13] obtained in abrupt pipe contractions and expansions, it can be deduced that the two-phase flow in a wide range of the mass flow quality have not been contracted. Only at a very narrow range of the air mass flow quality, less than 0.5% and greater than 95% the flow contraction appears, [8,9].…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…In accordance with the two-phase flow results, e.g., by Fr6hlich [6], Schmidt [8,9], Rivas [10], Shannak [11] and Morris [12,13] obtained in abrupt pipe contractions and expansions, it can be deduced that the two-phase flow in a wide range of the mass flow quality have not been contracted. Only at a very narrow range of the air mass flow quality, less than 0.5% and greater than 95% the flow contraction appears, [8,9].…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…In the case that the liquid is fully entrained in the gas phase (ψ = 1) and the oil travels at the same velocity as the gas phase, the homogeneous flow model is obtained, and the effective specific volume is given by Equation 1. The two-phase discharge coefficient C d is obtained by applying the two-phase flow model presented by Morris (1991), which yields a nominal value for C d of 0.77. The throat area of the nozzle is furthermore multiplied by a fictitious correction term X d in order to compensate for correlation uncertainty and additional flow irreversibilities not captured by the isentropic two-phase model.…”
Section: Two-phase Nozzle Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of a gas in the fluid stream reduces a jetting tool's efficiency. A mathematical model was created to predict the gas volume fractions, jet velocities, sonic velocities and impact pressure of a co-mingled fluid [4][5] and was verified using the test fixture. This model indicated that in general, as the gas ratio increases, the density drops at a rate approximately equal to double the rate at which the velocity increases.…”
Section: Liquid/gas Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%