2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2013
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2013.6566915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressing forwarding tables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compressing rules with prefix-only wildcards has a very old and rich literature in IPv4 networks. To mention a few, we can indicate to one-dimensional solutions ( Draves et al, 1999 ; Rétvári et al, 2013 ), a two-dimensional approach ( Rottenstreich et al, 2013 ), and multidimensional approaches like TCAM unification framework ( Norige, Liu & Torng, 2013 ) and TCAM Razor ( Liu, Meiners & Torng, 2009 ). Further references could be found in Braun & Menth (2014a) .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compressing rules with prefix-only wildcards has a very old and rich literature in IPv4 networks. To mention a few, we can indicate to one-dimensional solutions ( Draves et al, 1999 ; Rétvári et al, 2013 ), a two-dimensional approach ( Rottenstreich et al, 2013 ), and multidimensional approaches like TCAM unification framework ( Norige, Liu & Torng, 2013 ) and TCAM Razor ( Liu, Meiners & Torng, 2009 ). Further references could be found in Braun & Menth (2014a) .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TCAM enables parallel lookups on rules for line‐speed classification, this brutal force hardware solution is not only expensive, but also very power‐hungry, which seriously limits its scalability. During the past decade, a lot of methods and algorithms had been proposed to alleviate these problems, such as classifier minimisation [2–6], range encoding [7–11] and pre‐classifier [12–15]. However, due to inherent limitations of TCAM, the TCAM capacity is not expected to increase significantly in the near future [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we say that the obtained success probability for this encoding scheme C D = (σ 1 , σ 2 ) is the sum of probabilities for the successfully-encoded entries, i.e. Recently, an encoding scheme that minimizes the maximal encoding width of a given set of data entries was suggested ( in [3]. Unfortunately, the fixed width of a memory array is typically predetermined by its manufacturer and cannot be changed dynamically by the user.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the fixed width of a memory array is typically predetermined by its manufacturer and cannot be changed dynamically by the user. Furthermore, the worst-case approach of [3] may be too stringent. Therefore, the new probabilistic model we consider here of maximizing the success probability for a fixed L is a more realistic one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%