2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compression analysis for assessment of pellet plasticity: Identification of reactant pores and comparison between Heckel, Kawakita, and Adams equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study the Kawakita-Lüdde and Walker compression models were applied to estimate the compressibility characteristics and the deformation mechanism of the API and API-TNT composite containing powder mixtures. The widely used Kawakita-Lüdde model [13] describes the volume reduction of the powder at a given compression pressure as a function of the pressure and therefore makes the analysis of particle rearrangement and compactibility possible. However, it does not give much information about the deformation mechanism of the powders, thus it is necessary to complement the analysis with another model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study the Kawakita-Lüdde and Walker compression models were applied to estimate the compressibility characteristics and the deformation mechanism of the API and API-TNT composite containing powder mixtures. The widely used Kawakita-Lüdde model [13] describes the volume reduction of the powder at a given compression pressure as a function of the pressure and therefore makes the analysis of particle rearrangement and compactibility possible. However, it does not give much information about the deformation mechanism of the powders, thus it is necessary to complement the analysis with another model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ductile breakage has been observed for loose structures with a low bond stiffness [14,15]. Semi-brittle breakage is typical for intermediate compacted structures with an intermediate bond stiffness [11,17]. This classification was clearly reflected by the results of the experimental study of Ge et al [51], involving the breakage of 3D-printed agglomerates of dense and loose structures with rigid and soft bonds, which elucidated the effects of the packing density, inter-particle bond strength, and elasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…characterised by a round force-displacement response are considered semi-brittle. Semi-brittle materials include polymers [8,9], inorganic materials connected by a soft binder [10], and pharmaceutical granules [11]. Materials with loose structures and a low bond stiffness that exhibit a significant amount of fully plastic deformation prior to failure are considered ductile [5].…”
Section: Materials With Intermediate Compacted Structures and An Intementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the post-compressional properties of the tablets could also be determined with the same equipment and taken into consideration. The suitability of this methodology has already been proven by the work of Viana et al in comparing the compression performance of different types of celluloses [29]. The present work attempted to test the powder functionality of various API–TNT composites, and thereby investigate a completely unexplored but quite reasonable aspect of these composites, which may open new directions in the tabletting of nano-sized APIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In order to be able to draw useful and correct conclusions, four different APIs and their composites formed with TNTs were examined and compared regarding their mechanical properties. The powder compression mechanisms of materials are usually estimated by fitting data into mathematical (Heckel [23,24], Walker [25] and Kawakita-Lüdde [26]) models, which are widely used in the field of pharmaceutical technology [27,28,29]. However, it is notable that, besides some critical issues [30], these models describe only a given part of the compression cycle, and need to be combined with each other to give a complete view of the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%