2006
DOI: 10.1177/0963947006060550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compression and representation

Abstract: Mental spaces are often connected by vital conceptual relations. When mental spaces serve as inputs to a blended mental space, the vital conceptual relations between them can be ‘compressed’ to blended structure inside the blended mental space. In other words, ‘outer-space’ relations become ‘inner-space’ relations. This article discusses compression of the outer-space relation of representation under mental blending.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the process of compression, elements that are conceptually not compatible in terms of space, time, etc. are transformed to unique structures that are construable to the human mind (Turner, 2006).…”
Section: Metaphor As a Figurative And Cognitive Linguistic Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of compression, elements that are conceptually not compatible in terms of space, time, etc. are transformed to unique structures that are construable to the human mind (Turner, 2006).…”
Section: Metaphor As a Figurative And Cognitive Linguistic Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, out of the corpus of lexical means which hypothetically can verbalize one and the same situation in the world, some are more prominent prototypically and will be used more often in speech than the others -less prominent ones. For example, the noun and predicate surprise (4962), and their synonyms wonder (6188), shock (4163), disbelief (594), astonishment (505), amazement (471), bewilderment (230) are supposed to be used more often than to stagger (127), to amaze (95), to stun (83), to startle (64), to astound (18), to astonish (25), to shock [6]. They are considered to be prototypical means and specific markers to verbalize the prototypical situation of expressing surprise, because all together they make a high percentage of performance.…”
Section: Prototypical Means To Verbalize the Prototypical Situatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only those meanings of mental spaces that are relevant for the speaker in a new entity can be subject to integration, while the others are ignored. [14], [17], [18]. As an example by Fauconnier, "He is the Immanuel Kant of modern philosophy" is considered to be the blend where two input mental spaces have been projected ("a modern philosopher" and "Immanuel Kant"), and the meaning is conveyed that this philosopher is exceptionally competent.…”
Section: Non-prototypical Means To Verbalize the Prototypical Sitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CB is based on Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), in terms of mappings and projections, and Mental Spaces Theory (MST) in terms of mental spaces to account for the construction of meanings (Evans & Green, 2006). Conceptual Integration Theory is a basic mental activity embedded in every aspect of human experience (Coulson & Oakley, 2000;Evans & Green, 2006;Fauconnier & Turner, 2002;Turner, 2006). Coulson and Oakley (2000) claim that "Conceptual blending is a theoretical framework for exploring human information integration" (p.176).…”
Section: Theoretical Background 31 Conceptual Integration Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two input spaces contain distinct organizing frames that compose the blend (Fauconnier &Turner, 2002;Turner, 2006). However, the structure resulting from inputs is sometimes incompatible and thus leads to clashes between the organizing frames, which render the blend extremely innovative (Fauconnier & Turner, 2002).…”
Section: Double-scope Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%