2018
DOI: 10.1177/0021955x18806794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compression of polystyrene and polypropylene foams for energy absorption applications: A combined mechanical and microstructural study

Abstract: In many applications polymeric foams (such as expanded polystyrene, EPS, or polypropylene, EPP) are used for protection from impacts. Standard design requires the foam to maximize the energy absorption, thus achieving large deformations (typically up to 25% and above in compression) while maintaining the stress level below a threshold value. In this work steam chest moulded EPS and EPP were characterized in relation to their density, microstructure and applied strain rate. Typical mechanical parameters (elasti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This response has its explanation in the rate-dependency of the EPS foam as pointed out in the study by Avalle et al 28 for foam-type materials, i.e., when they deform, the air or gas contained in the cells is compressed or forced outside, letting a fluid flow, dependent on the compression rate, to drive the macro response of the material. As for the effect that the density has in the stress response, the results are consistent with what it is reported and explained thoroughly in the materials foam literature, 11,26,29 i.e., the material shows a stiffer response at high densities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This response has its explanation in the rate-dependency of the EPS foam as pointed out in the study by Avalle et al 28 for foam-type materials, i.e., when they deform, the air or gas contained in the cells is compressed or forced outside, letting a fluid flow, dependent on the compression rate, to drive the macro response of the material. As for the effect that the density has in the stress response, the results are consistent with what it is reported and explained thoroughly in the materials foam literature, 11,26,29 i.e., the material shows a stiffer response at high densities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…10 The mechanical response of the EPS material has been extensively studied utilizing analytical and numerical modeling of its micromechanical structure. Andena et al 11 found that the Gibson-Ashby model 9 can provide reasonable approximations for the first and the second stress stages for most foams of study, including the EPS. Such a model has also been applied to study the macro response of the EPS for constant strain rate conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinetic energy-absorbing capability on the right level is very important, because values of the peak force and acceleration over the threshold could cause injury or damage. Energy absorbed during single or multiple impacts can be described in several ways [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. For example, as a relation between peak impact deceleration of the real foam and “ideal” foam, and the ability to completely absorb impact energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive data set acquired at different strain rates is needed to cover application requirements for particular material use. The material structure and the strain rate of polymer foams was considered by Luca Andena et al They have used Nagy’s phenomenological model and determined the material stress–strain behaviour at a reference strain rate [ 3 ]. To predict foam behaviour under specific conditions and optimizing design of energy absorption devices, various models were developed, trying to capture actual material mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic cushion factors of expanded polyethylene foams range from 3.95 to 4.70 depending on the density of EPE. 16,19 The C* value of the 3D printed foam in this study was approximately 3.27 before densification (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%