2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compression–shear strength criterion of coal–rock combination model considering interface effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the loading process, the axial stress loaded on the coal elements and rock elements is same [2,15]. Due to differences in the elastic modulus (E), a completely different deformation pattern is exhibited by the coal elements and rock elements in sandwiched specimens [14,15]. In the present study, the elastic modulus of coal elements was less than that of rock elements.…”
Section: Unbalanced Deformation Characteristics Of Coal Elements and mentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the loading process, the axial stress loaded on the coal elements and rock elements is same [2,15]. Due to differences in the elastic modulus (E), a completely different deformation pattern is exhibited by the coal elements and rock elements in sandwiched specimens [14,15]. In the present study, the elastic modulus of coal elements was less than that of rock elements.…”
Section: Unbalanced Deformation Characteristics Of Coal Elements and mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Previous studies showed that coal elements are usually the main rupture damage elements, while rock elements are rarely damaged [14,17]. This is because the UCS of rock elements in these literatures was significantly more than that of coal elements.…”
Section: Induced Damage Mechanism Of Rock Elementsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We now define the stress concentration factor k=2, overlying rock formation gravity =18 kN/m 3 , coal seam Poisson's ratio ] m =0.32, and buried depth H=100-500 m. According to the geological exploration data of weakly cemented soft rock, the limit equilibrium zone width is analyzed using three groups of parameters, as seen in Table 1 [3,4,32]. Table 1 is displayed in Figure 7.…”
Section: An Analysis Of Factors Influencing the Limit Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weakly cemented soft rocks, e.g., Cretaceous and Jurassic mudstone, argillaceous siltstone, sandstone, and silt, are widely distributed in Xinjiang, Gansu, Ningxia, western Inner Mongolia, and other areas in western China. The unique physical and mechanical properties of weakly cemented soft rocks are formed in western China due to its special geographical and climate conditions, sedimentary process, and geological conditions, and the rocks are characterized by a low strength, poor cementation, possible weathering, possible argillization and disintegration when encountering water, unstable mechanical properties, and large areas of disturbance, and quick deformation in the surrounding rock after the coal seam has been excavated, resulting in frequent engineering accidents or disasters, such as a large caving in the roof and high walls, and serious floor heave, all of which can cause considerable economic losses and threats to the security of energy engineering construction in western China [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al pointed out that the coal-rock combination with weak interface trended to isotropic rock when the confining pressure is raised to a specific value [14]. Shen et al indicated that the side abutment pressure could result in a relative displacement for entry roof with the weak plane [2,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%