2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressive and bending behaviours of wood-based two-dimensional lattice truss core sandwich structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Woven corrugated cores from a previous study also resulted in a sandwich structure that showed an excellent skin‐core delamination resistance . Truss core‐based sandwich structures, such as lattice truss core sandwich panels and pyramidal truss core sandwich structures, have also drawn significant attention in past years, which exhibit good energy‐absorption ability mainly for out‐of‐phase bending and compressive loads.…”
Section: Sandwich Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Woven corrugated cores from a previous study also resulted in a sandwich structure that showed an excellent skin‐core delamination resistance . Truss core‐based sandwich structures, such as lattice truss core sandwich panels and pyramidal truss core sandwich structures, have also drawn significant attention in past years, which exhibit good energy‐absorption ability mainly for out‐of‐phase bending and compressive loads.…”
Section: Sandwich Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surfaces from poplar laminated veneer lumber (LVL) decrease the flexural modulus 4.30 GPa and strength to 7.74 MPa according to Jin and Wang [51].…”
Section: Overview Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the stiffness and strength of honeycomb panels, sandwich panels with the following types of core are much stronger: coating (Kavermann and Bhattacharyya 2019;Smardzewski and Jasińska 2016), lattice truss (Jin et al 2015;Xu et al 2016), pyramidal (Qi and Ma 2018;Xiong et al 2014a, b;Xu et al 2015), kagome (Klimek et al 2016) cubic or cubic + octet (isomax) (Yazdani Sarvestani et al 2018). Wang (2019) made a comprehensive overview on the development of the innovative honeycomb-based structures in the past two decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%