2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00723-015-0683-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressively Sampled MR Image Reconstruction Using Hyperbolic Tangent-Based Soft-Thresholding

Abstract: The application of compressed sensing (CS) to magnetic resonance (MR) images utilizes the transformed domain sparsity to enable the reconstruction from an under-sampled k-space (Fourier) data using a non-linear recovery algorithm. In order to estimate the missing k-space data from the partial Fourier samples, the reconstruction algorithms minimize an objective function based on mixed l 1 -l 2 norms. Iterative-shrinkage algorithms, such as parallel coordinate descent (PCD) and separable surrogate functional, pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our de-noising/reconstruction of the sparse signals and images, we addressed this problem. Some of the methods used for de-noising and recovery of sparse signals are soft thresholding [1], hard thresholding [2], firm thresholding [5], and hyperbolic tangent thresholding [7]. An improved total variation regularization is applied to remove salt and pepper noise from images [36].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our de-noising/reconstruction of the sparse signals and images, we addressed this problem. Some of the methods used for de-noising and recovery of sparse signals are soft thresholding [1], hard thresholding [2], firm thresholding [5], and hyperbolic tangent thresholding [7]. An improved total variation regularization is applied to remove salt and pepper noise from images [36].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different sparsity-based algorithms have been developed in the past to de-noise and recover sparse signals and images, that is, soft thresholding [1], hard thresholding [2], [3], [4], firm thresholding [5], non-negative garrote thresholding [6], hyperbolic tangent thresholding [7], logarithmic thresholding [8], hankel sparse low-rank approximation [9], proximal operators [10], [11], [12], alternating direction method of multipliers [13], [14], block thresholding [15], and overlapping group shrinkage (OGS) [16]. Along with these established techniques, some new techniques are also used for de-noising of specific image types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the edge of this reduced scan time, CS-MRI has additional computational overhead compared to standard MRI where only inverse Fourier transform is enough [22]. The CS-MRI trends can be broadly categorized as methods focused on improving the reconstruction strategies [23,24], and parallel CS-MRI techniques [25]. For successful CS-MRI, the sparse regularization can be achieved in a specific transform domain or using some dictionary learning techniques [26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent trends of CSMRI can be classified as techniques dedicated to improved reconstruction techniques [43][44][45] and parallel CSMRI approaches [4,5,40,42,46,47]. In CSMRI, the sparse regularization has been accomplished BioMed Research International through a particular transform domain, such as the wavelet [10] and curvelet [48], or through some dictionary learning approaches [49][50][51][52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%