2016
DOI: 10.4155/ppa-2016-0035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compulsory Licenses As a Defense in Pharmaceutical and Biotech Patent Litigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LMICs argued for the right to issue compulsory licensing for patented pharmaceuticals that were expensive for their citizens, while high-income countries, usually influenced by the pharmaceutical industry, argued for the limited use of compulsory licensing [37]. High-income countries feared that massive issuance of compulsory licensing would adversely impact the profits of the industry and would harm the ability of these companies to research and develop in the long term [36, 38]. Therefore, the use of compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals was restricted to highly infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS in LMICs [39], and compulsory licensing other than this restricted area was deemed unjustifiable [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LMICs argued for the right to issue compulsory licensing for patented pharmaceuticals that were expensive for their citizens, while high-income countries, usually influenced by the pharmaceutical industry, argued for the limited use of compulsory licensing [37]. High-income countries feared that massive issuance of compulsory licensing would adversely impact the profits of the industry and would harm the ability of these companies to research and develop in the long term [36, 38]. Therefore, the use of compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals was restricted to highly infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS in LMICs [39], and compulsory licensing other than this restricted area was deemed unjustifiable [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The license seeker then responded by requesting a compulsory license under the Patent Act [42]. Specifically, the Court concluded that the license seeker was entitled to emergency relief and granted provisional compulsory licensing based on the need of patients to have the drug available continuously during the course of treatment [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, in 2016, the German Federal Patent Court ordered a CL for HIV/AIDS drugs under Section 24 of the Patent Act for the first time. 24 Second, China recently released the "Measures for Compulsory Licensing of Patent Implementation" that updated intellectual property laws to allow for CL. Under the new measures, China's State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) may issue and terminate compulsory licensing for patents considering 3 factors: non-use of the patented invention or misuse of patent; public welfare, including public interest and national emergency; and cross licensing for exploitation of an improvement invention.…”
Section: Current Understandings Of CL and Possible Factors Influencinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to increase the availability of sofosbuvir for patients with hepatitis C is necessary the use of the "flexible" mechanisms of the TRIPS Agreement (Agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights), namely involving the grant of compulsory licenses, the implementation of parallel imports, the tightening of the criteria for patentability etc. [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%