Thousands of plant and animal species have been observed to have superhydrophobic surfaces that lead to various novel behaviors. These observations have inspired attempts to create artificial superhydrophobic surfaces, given that such surfaces have multitudinous applications. Superhydrophobicity is an enhanced effect of surface roughness and there are known relationships that correlate surface roughness and superhydrophobicity, based on the underlying physics. However, while these examples demonstrate the level of roughness they tell us little about the independence of this effect in terms of its scale. Thus, they are not capable of explaining why such naturally occurring surfaces commonly have micron-submicron sizes. Here we report on the discovery of a new relation, its physical basis and its experimental verification. The results reveal that scaling-down roughness into the micro-submicron range is a unique and elegant strategy to not only achieve superhydrophobicity but also to increase its stability against environmental disturbances. This new relation takes into account the previously overlooked but key fact that the accumulated line energy arising from the numerous solid-water-air intersections that can be distributed over the apparent contact area, when air packets are trapped at small scales on the surface, can dramatically increase as the roughness scale shrinks. This term can in fact become the dominant contributor to the surface energy and so becomes crucial for accomplishing superhydrophobicity. These findings guide fabrication of stable super water-repellant surfaces. scale effect, line tension, wetting, contact angle, superhydrophobic PACS: 47.55.np, 47.55.dr, 68.08.Bc, 68.03.Cd, 87.15.LaWetting on a rough substrate is considered to be either in the Wenzel [1] or Cassie-Baxter state [2]. In the former, the liquid follows the surface corrugations, as shown in Figure 1(a); in the latter the water drop is attached to the surface but in a position on top of the corrugations, which allows air pockets to be trapped under it, as shown in Figure 1(b). Usually, only one of these states is stable while the other is metastable [3][4][5], depending on both the surface chemistry and roughness. It is well known that wetting in the Cassie-Baxter, rather than Wenzel, state is energetically favorable if the hydrophobic surface is sufficiently rough [3][4][5][6] and this is generally considered to be a requirement for achieving superhydrophobicity [7]. In both states, minimizing the system free energy can yield apparent contact angles, θ * , that are functions of the intrinsic or chemical contact angle θ (measured on flat solids) and the topography of the roughness structure. Chemically modifying the surface alone can typically lead to intrinsic contact angles of up to 120°, but not more [8,9]. The relation between the apparent and intrinsic contact angles in the Wenzel state is given by cosθ * = rcosθ. The parameter r is the ratio of the wet surface area to its projection or apparent area. In the Cassie-Baxter stat...