1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02198297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of limit periodic continued fractions. A survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider a two-variant CF of the form (2), belonging to the class D. In some cases, one may approximate its value using the following classic methods: (A) Computing classical approximants S n (0) for sufficiently large n, (B) Applying the methods of [7] to even (odd) part of CF, (C) Applying the methods of [10] to even (odd) part of CF, (D) Using equivalent transformation in order to obtain limit 2-periodic CF, and using the techniques given in [7], (E) Using the recent methods of Paszkowski [12]; for more details on numerical computation of CFs see, e.g., [9,Section 5].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Consider a two-variant CF of the form (2), belonging to the class D. In some cases, one may approximate its value using the following classic methods: (A) Computing classical approximants S n (0) for sufficiently large n, (B) Applying the methods of [7] to even (odd) part of CF, (C) Applying the methods of [10] to even (odd) part of CF, (D) Using equivalent transformation in order to obtain limit 2-periodic CF, and using the techniques given in [7], (E) Using the recent methods of Paszkowski [12]; for more details on numerical computation of CFs see, e.g., [9,Section 5].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the classic methods (B), the most efficient one is 'improvement machine' of Lorentzen and Waadeland (see [5], [7,Section 6] or [9, p. 227]). However their idea can be applied only to CFs of loxodromic type.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations