2004
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2003.822860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of Maximal Safe Sets for Switching Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We base our contribution on invariant set results for linear and general PWA systems (Blanchini, 1999;Kolmanovsky and Gilbert, 1998;Kerrigan, 2000;Raković et al, 2004;Saint-Pierre, 1994) and on recent results for linear switched systems (Julius and van der Schaft, 2002;De Santis et al, 2004). Our results agree with the general and abstract viability theory framework elaborated in (Aubin, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…We base our contribution on invariant set results for linear and general PWA systems (Blanchini, 1999;Kolmanovsky and Gilbert, 1998;Kerrigan, 2000;Raković et al, 2004;Saint-Pierre, 1994) and on recent results for linear switched systems (Julius and van der Schaft, 2002;De Santis et al, 2004). Our results agree with the general and abstract viability theory framework elaborated in (Aubin, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…We remark that the procedure outlined, contrary to De Santis et al [2004], does not require CV to be a C-set (a convex compact set with a nonempty interior containing the origin) and it appears simpler to implement. When X, U, V, are specified as convex polyhedra, Algorithm 1 reduces to a sequence of linear programs and elementary operations on convex sets.…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawback however is that an initial control invariant set S -with respect to a given P and given V -must be found. This is easy to do in absence of disturbances, for in that case the equilibrium state x e is evidently invariant under u e such that x e = Ax e + Bu e , and it can be assumed Gutman, Cwikel [1987], De Santis et al [2004] S = {x e } as a starting point for the internal algorithm. However, we know of no general procedure to determine S in presence of disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equation implicitly determines the maximal controlled invariant set and the least restrictive feedback control map. Due to the complexity of exactly solving the HJB equation, researchers have been investigating approximate algorithms for computing inner-approximations of the maximal controlled invariant set [30,31,44,50]. Termination of the algorithm that computes the maximal controlled invariant set is often an issue and work has been investigating special classes of systems that allow to prove termination [46][47][48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%