Computational analysis optimizes the flow cytometric evaluation for lymphoma

Abstract

Background: Although many clinical laboratories are adopting higher color flow cytometric assays, the approach to optimizing panel design and data analysis is often traditional and subjective. In order to address the question "What is the best flow cytometric strategy to reliably distinguish germinal center B-cell lymphoma (GC-L) from germinal center hyperplasia (GC-H)?" we applied a computational tool that identifies target populations correlated with a desired outcome, in this case diagnosis.Design: Cases of GC-H and GC-L evaluated by flow cytometric immunophenotyping using CD45, CD20, kappa, lambda, CD19, CD5, CD10, CD38, were analyzed with flowType and RchyOptimyx to construct cellular hierarchies that best distinguished the two diagnostic groups.Results: The population CD52CD191CD101CD382 had the highest predictive power. Manual reanalysis confirmed significantly higher CD101/CD382B-cells in GC-L (median 12.44%, range 0.74-63.29, n 5 52) than GC-H (median 0.24%, 0.03-4.49, n 5 48, P 5 0.0001), but was not entirely specific. Difficulties encountered using this computational approach included the presence of CD101 granulocytes, continuously variable B-cell expression of CD38, more variable intensity antigen staining in GC-L and inability to assess the contribution of light chain restriction.Conclusion: Computational analysis with construction of cellular hierarchies related to diagnosis helped guide manual analysis of high dimensional flow cytometric data. This approach highlighted the diagnostic utility of CD38 expression in the evaluation of B-cells with a CD101 GC phenotype. In contrast to computational analysis of non-neoplastic cell populations, evaluation of neoplastic cells must be able to take into consideration increased variability in antigen expression. V C 2013 International Clinical