2010
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/28/283101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational approaches to 3D modeling of RNA

Abstract: Many exciting discoveries have recently revealed the versatility of RNA and its importance in a variety of functions within the cell. Since the structural features of RNA are of major importance to their biological function, there is much interest in predicting RNA structure, either in free form or in interaction with various ligands, including proteins, metabolites and other molecules. In recent years, an increasing number of researchers have developed novel RNA algorithms for predicting RNA secondary and ter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
129
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
0
129
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Programs MC-Sym (2), FARNA (3), and NAST (1) produce all-atom models from 2D structures based on fragment libraries (MC-Sym and FARNA) or one-bead models (NAST). Though these tools predict small structures (<40 nt) reasonably, errors increase as RNA lengths increase (6). Here, we translate predicted all-atom models from these programs to 3D graphs and compute graph rmsds between these graphs and our predictions in Table 1 and SI Appendix, Table S2.…”
Section: Assessment Of Mc/sa Results Without Knowledge Of Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Programs MC-Sym (2), FARNA (3), and NAST (1) produce all-atom models from 2D structures based on fragment libraries (MC-Sym and FARNA) or one-bead models (NAST). Though these tools predict small structures (<40 nt) reasonably, errors increase as RNA lengths increase (6). Here, we translate predicted all-atom models from these programs to 3D graphs and compute graph rmsds between these graphs and our predictions in Table 1 and SI Appendix, Table S2.…”
Section: Assessment Of Mc/sa Results Without Knowledge Of Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though general automated prediction of RNA tertiary (3D) structure from the primary sequence remains elusive, many effective approaches exist for analyzing and describing 3D RNA structures as well as predicting reasonably 3D aspects of small RNAs, ranging from coarse-grained modeling (1) to various structure assembly (2), energy minimization (3), molecular dynamics (4), and other conformational sampling approaches (5,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One limitation of this study is the use of an in silico prediction of the secondary structures of the 3 -UTR. Sfold is unable to predict pseudoknots and the accuracy of the prediction also diminishes as the size of the RNA increases (Laing & Schlick, 2010). A significant amount of research has nevertheless been conducted to accurately determine the energies that stabilize helices (SantaLucia & Turner, 1997;Xia et al, 1998;Mathews et al, 1999) and secondary structure prediction remains a powerful tool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are multiple tools and computational approaches that can describe RNA structure at various levels of detail. [14][15][16] In an important series of works [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] the thermodynamics of RNA secondary structure (i.e., the list of base pairs in the folded state of RNA) was characterized in terms of a nearest-neighbor model for calculating the free energies of various secondary-structure motifs. The nearest-neighbor model is the basis of various tools for the prediction of the secondary structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%