2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational assessment of temperature variations through calibrated orifices subjected to high pressure drops: Application to diesel injection nozzles

Abstract: Computational assessment of temperature variations through calibrated orifices subjected to high pressure drops: application to diesel injection nozzles.. Energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that, given the 1D approach followed in this work, the values of ΔT presented correspond to the fuel bulk temperature. A similar result has been reported in the literature through 3D CFD approaches by Theodorakakos et al [32] , Strotos et al [33] and the authors [34], showing that the fuel temperature is expected to vary in the radial direction, being heated in the wall vicinities where the friction losses are located (boundary layer) and being subcooled near the orifices axes. The transitional Cd among heating and cooling in steady-state conditions is slightly lower than the maximum discharge coefficient of the nozzle orifices.…”
Section: Analysis For the Nozzle Orificessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It is important to note that, given the 1D approach followed in this work, the values of ΔT presented correspond to the fuel bulk temperature. A similar result has been reported in the literature through 3D CFD approaches by Theodorakakos et al [32] , Strotos et al [33] and the authors [34], showing that the fuel temperature is expected to vary in the radial direction, being heated in the wall vicinities where the friction losses are located (boundary layer) and being subcooled near the orifices axes. The transitional Cd among heating and cooling in steady-state conditions is slightly lower than the maximum discharge coefficient of the nozzle orifices.…”
Section: Analysis For the Nozzle Orificessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The injector ran with n-dodecane fuel, whose main physical properties are gathered on Table 1 for the experimental conditions used along the tests. These values have been obtained using similar expressions as the ones found in [32] as a function of pressure, but adapted for ndodecane based on the information in [33]. A constant duration of the electronic pulse to the piezoeletric valve of 2 ms is selected to ensure that the hydraulic duration of the injection event is long enough.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a 2000 bar injection is considered, the maximum temperature difference in the flow can reach 80°C between the fluid at the core region and the one at the walls, which is a remarkable value if the temperature dependence of the fuel properties is taken into account. 27 All this highlights a significant role of thermal aspects in the hydraulic performance of a CR system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%