Computational complexity comparison of feedforward/radial basis function/recurrent neural network-based equalizer for a 50-Gb/s PAM4 direct-detection optical link

Abstract

The computational complexity and system bit-error-rate (BER) performance of four types of neural-network-based nonlinear equalizers are analyzed for a 50-Gb/s pulse amplitude modulation (PAM)-4 direct-detection (DD) optical link. The four types are feedforward neural networks (F-NN), radial basis function neural networks (RBF-NN), auto-regressive recurrent neural networks (AR-RNN) and layer-recurrent neural networks (L-RNN). Numerical results show that, for a fixed BER threshold, the AR-RNN-based equalizers have the lowest computational complexity. Amongst all the nonlinear NN-based equalizers with the same number of inputs and hidden neurons, F-NN-based equalizers have the lowest computational complexity while the AR-RNN-based equalizers exhibit the best BER performance. Compared with F-NN or RNN, RBF-NN tends to require more hidden neurons with the increase of the number of inputs, making it not suitable for long fiber transmission distance. We also demonstrate that only a few tens of multiplications per symbol are needed for NN-based equalizers to guarantee a good BER performance. This relatively low computational complexity signifies that various NN-based equalizers can be potentially implemented in real time. More broadly, this paper provides guidelines for selecting a suitable NN-based equalizer based on BER and computational complexity requirements.

56-Gbit/s PAM-4 Optical Signal Transmission Over 100-km SMF Enabled by TCNN Regression Model

“…The computation complexity for fully connected neural networks is defined as number of multiplication operation as calculated [9]:…”

“…In recent years, various DSP algorithms have been reported in IM/DD systems to alleviate or mitigate CD effect, such as feed-forward equalization (FFE), decision feedback equalization (DFE), Volterra equalizer (VE), maximum likelihood sequence estimation (MLSE), Tomlinson-Harashima pre-coding and neural network. Among these algorithms, neural network with the inherent advantage of approximating any nonlinear function is considered to have great potential to mitigate CD effect and device nonlinear effect in IM/DD systems [8][9][10][11]. The development of integrated photonics technology [12] offers great potential for the application of neural networks.…”

Designing RBFNs Structure Using Similarity-Based and Kernel-Based Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Algorithms

“…The problem of the computational complexity of the RBF network design received a lot of attention and has been discussed by many researchers in the past (see, for example, [11], [28], [40], [46]), as well as in more current research (see, for example, [21], [43], [47], [58], [59]). Such a wide interest shows also that RBFNs design is still a lively area of research within the machine learning community and a search for approaches improving process of initialization and training of neural networks, including RBFNs, is still going on.…”

Machine Learning Applications for Short Reach Optical Communication

“…In both visible light communication (VLC) and near-infrared indoor OWC systems, the ML technique has been applied to improve the data transmission performance, mainly by suppressing the inter-symbol interference and nonlinear effects existing in the system [79,80]. In addition, the ML technique has also been widely applied in OWCbased in-building/indoor positioning systems, where better positioning accuracy, as well as simultaneous positioning and receiver orientation estimations, have been realized [81].…”