2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational crack propagation analysis with consideration of weld residual stresses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the weld joints due to inhomogeneity, the yield strength of the material decreases, 46 moreover, the temperature in the LWRs is too high, hence the plastic strain region increases rendering Alloy 600 a susceptible material to SCC. 47 The tensile normal strain distribution concerning the crack-tip distance is shown in Figure 14. With an increase in the value of hardening exponent the values of plastic strain increase.…”
Section: Effect Of Macrostructural Parameters On Normal Plastic Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the weld joints due to inhomogeneity, the yield strength of the material decreases, 46 moreover, the temperature in the LWRs is too high, hence the plastic strain region increases rendering Alloy 600 a susceptible material to SCC. 47 The tensile normal strain distribution concerning the crack-tip distance is shown in Figure 14. With an increase in the value of hardening exponent the values of plastic strain increase.…”
Section: Effect Of Macrostructural Parameters On Normal Plastic Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found that the distribution of welding residual stress depends on several main factors such as structural dimensions, material properties, restraint conditions, heat input, number of welding pass and welding sequence [10] . Additionally, the uncertainty of welding residual stress measurements and modeling predictions is not well understood [11] . At present, the effect of randomness on the residual stress distribution has rarely been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not focusing on the effect of welding process parameters and microstructural changes, we will concentrate on the effect of welding residual stress on fatigue crack propagation, which should be taken into account for predicting fatigue life. Numerical and experimental analyses of welded joints were performed to understand and describe the effect of residual stress on distributions of the stress intensity factor along the crack front and fatigue crack propagation rate …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical and experimental analyses of welded joints were performed to understand and describe the effect of residual stress on Nomenclature: Δa, crack increment; q T , correction function; C, n, m, Paris, Forman material constants; C T , constant in correction function; E, Young modulus; K, stress intensity factor; ΔK, stress intensity factor range; N, number of cycles; R, stress intensity factor ratio; s, crack front coordinate; T, nonsingular T-stress; x, y, z, Cartesian crack tip coordinates; r, θ, polar crack tip coordinates; X, Y, Z, Cartesian global coordinates; ν, Poisson ratio; σ Y , yield stress Subscripts: app, applied; ell, ellipse; max, maximum; min, minimum; res, residual; C, critical distributions of the stress intensity factor along the crack front and fatigue crack propagation rate. [10][11][12][13][14] In spite of significant progress in the study of the effect of welding residual stress on the fatigue crack growth rate, the interpretation of most results is given in terms of the stress intensity factor in the framework of the validity of linear elastic fracture mechanics. It should be noted that other failure theories such strain-based criteria can also be used to predict the fatigue life of welded structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%