1982
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(82)90094-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational error estimates and adaptive processes for some nonlinear structural problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some results for nonlinear boundary value problems have been obtained, beginning with early work on a posteriori error estimation for nonlinear equations by Carey [23] and Babuška and Rheinboldt [24]. Their error indicators were based on local residuals and element nonlinear problems with Dirichlet boundary data, respectively.…”
Section: B R Carnes and G F Careymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some results for nonlinear boundary value problems have been obtained, beginning with early work on a posteriori error estimation for nonlinear equations by Carey [23] and Babuška and Rheinboldt [24]. Their error indicators were based on local residuals and element nonlinear problems with Dirichlet boundary data, respectively.…”
Section: B R Carnes and G F Careymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For elliptic problems, the appropriate norm appears naturally as they energy norm and a fairly complete and general theory of error estimators is available [24,25). However, far less research has been directed towards hyperbolic problems and e detailed theory is still lacking.…”
Section: Mesh Enrichmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed methods based on the use of SA-field, like the error in constitutive equation (Ladevèze, 1975;Ladevèze and Leguillon, 1983) or like the equilibrated residuals (Babuška and Rheinboldt, 1978;Babuška and Miller, 1987), provide efficient error estimators, for global or local quantities (Ladevèze and Moës, 1999;Prudhomme and Oden, 1999;Ohnimus et al, 2001;Becker and Rannacher, 2001), even in some nonlinear contexts (Babuška and Rheinboldt, 1982;Ladevèze et al, 1986;Ladevèze, 2001;Louf et al, 2003) and domain decomposition methods (Parret-Fréaud et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%