2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15823.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Eulerian hydrodynamics and Galilean invariance

Abstract: Eulerian hydrodynamical simulations are a powerful and popular tool for modelling fluids in astrophysical systems. In this work, we critically examine recent claims that these methods violate Galilean invariance of the Euler equations. We demonstrate that Eulerian hydrodynamics methods do converge to a Galilean‐invariant solution, provided a well‐defined convergent solution exists. Specifically, we show that numerical diffusion, resulting from diffusion‐like terms in the discretized hydrodynamical equations so… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
112
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An L1 error norm for the KH problem has been introduced by Robertson et al (2010) and, in analogy with their Equation 11, we conjecture here for L1 a generic dependence of the form…”
Section: 1)mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An L1 error norm for the KH problem has been introduced by Robertson et al (2010) and, in analogy with their Equation 11, we conjecture here for L1 a generic dependence of the form…”
Section: 1)mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The simulations of Robertson et al (2010) were performed using the Eulerian mesh code ART (Kravtsov et al 1997); note however that their initial condition setup corresponds here to The ratio between the error norms of two different KH runs is then…”
Section: 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This creates a finite shearing layer between the slab and the background, with a width of ∼ 3σ for 95% convergence, which suppresses the growth of perturbations with wavelengths comparable to or smaller than the shearing layer (Robertson et al 2010). In order to effectively suppress the grid noise we find that we require σ > 2∆, where ∆ is the cell size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass of the particles was arranged to obtain the correct density profile following a ramp function Robertson et al (2010). In this way, we smoothed the interface density jump to make it comparable to the SPH resolution using…”
Section: Kelvin-helmholtz Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%