2004
DOI: 10.2514/1.10698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Evaluation of Quiet Tunnel Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Stability Experiments

Abstract: Manning, Melissa Lynn. Computational Evaluation of Quiet Tunnel Hypersonic Boundary Layer Stability Experiments. (Under the direction of Dr. Ndaona Chokani.) A computational evaluation of two stability experiments conducted in the NASA Langley Mach 6 axisymmetric quiet nozzle test chamber facility is conducted. Navier-Stokes analysis of the mean flow and linear stability theory analysis of boundary layer disturbances is performed in the computations. The effects of adverse pressure gradient and wall cooling ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The computed pressure distribution agreeed well with the experiment data for Model 93-10, while there was a slight deficiency compared to the experiment data for Model 91-6. However, the present results showed a better agreement than the Manning's computations [21].…”
Section: Numerical Results Of Laminar Flowscontrasting
confidence: 41%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The computed pressure distribution agreeed well with the experiment data for Model 93-10, while there was a slight deficiency compared to the experiment data for Model 91-6. However, the present results showed a better agreement than the Manning's computations [21].…”
Section: Numerical Results Of Laminar Flowscontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…The pressure was close to each other before and after the oblique shock, yet tail pressure on Model 91-6 was notably larger than that of 93-10 through the compression waves. Surface pressure distributions along streamwise direction are plotted in Figure 3, where (a) gives the results computed by the present work, and (b) the results obtained by Manning [21]. It is seen for the present results that the wall pressure distributions remained constant on the cones and then grew sharply on the flares.…”
Section: Numerical Results Of Laminar Flowsmentioning
confidence: 57%