Mass and Motion in General Relativity 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3015-3_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Methods for the Self-Force in Black Hole Spacetimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we investigate how well does the post-Newtonian expansion compare with another very important approximation scheme in general relativity: The gravitational self-force approach, based on black-hole perturbation theory, which gives an accurate description of extreme mass ratio binaries having q ≪ 1 or equivalently ν ≪ 1, even in the strong field regime. The gravitational self-force analysis [317, 360, 178, 231] (see [348, 177, 23] for reviews) is thus expected to provide templates for extreme mass ratio inspirals (EMRI) anticipated to be present in the bandwidth of space-based detectors.…”
Section: Conservative Dynamics Of Compact Binariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we investigate how well does the post-Newtonian expansion compare with another very important approximation scheme in general relativity: The gravitational self-force approach, based on black-hole perturbation theory, which gives an accurate description of extreme mass ratio binaries having q ≪ 1 or equivalently ν ≪ 1, even in the strong field regime. The gravitational self-force analysis [317, 360, 178, 231] (see [348, 177, 23] for reviews) is thus expected to provide templates for extreme mass ratio inspirals (EMRI) anticipated to be present in the bandwidth of space-based detectors.…”
Section: Conservative Dynamics Of Compact Binariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where F is any smooth function representing a time derivative of the quadrupole moment, and Q denotes the Legendre function of the second kind. 23 Note that there is no need to include a finite part operation FP in Eq. ( 83) as the integral is convergent.…”
Section: Gravitational-wave Tails and Tails-of-tailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating F requires computing (or retrieving from a cache) the 2-D puncture field and effective source. 31 We have considered a number of possible choices for precisely which terms from the main evolution equation (2.40) should be treated implicitly (i.e., put into G). 31 Unfortunately, in all IMEX schemes of which we are aware it is not the case that there are repeated evaluations of F with different state vectors at the same time coordinate, so there is no reuse possible of the puncture field and effective source from one evaluation to the next.…”
Section: Implicit-explicit (Imex) Evolution Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 We have considered a number of possible choices for precisely which terms from the main evolution equation (2.40) should be treated implicitly (i.e., put into G). 31 Unfortunately, in all IMEX schemes of which we are aware it is not the case that there are repeated evaluations of F with different state vectors at the same time coordinate, so there is no reuse possible of the puncture field and effective source from one evaluation to the next. In contrast (as noted in section IV B 2), with the classical RK4 scheme 50% of evaluations are repeated in this way, so -since the effective source computation dominates the code's overall running time -there is an easy factor-of-two saving in computational cost by caching and reusing the effective source from one evaluation to the next if the evaluation time is unchanged.…”
Section: Implicit-explicit (Imex) Evolution Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation