2020
DOI: 10.4271/2020-01-1155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Modeling of Diesel Spray Combustion with Multiple Injections

Abstract: DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion of atomization sub-model might improve the prediction, which is of great interest for future investigation. The computed vapor penetration evidences a rather good agreement with experiments, which is a prerequisite for proceeding to combustion simulations and further validation of the numerical setup was reported in [35].…”
Section: Diesel-like Spray Combustion Vesselsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The inclusion of atomization sub-model might improve the prediction, which is of great interest for future investigation. The computed vapor penetration evidences a rather good agreement with experiments, which is a prerequisite for proceeding to combustion simulations and further validation of the numerical setup was reported in [35].…”
Section: Diesel-like Spray Combustion Vesselsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Regarding the turbulent spray modeling, a set of models falling into such technique were compared in [29,30], including tabulated well-mixed model (TWM), tabulated representative flamelet interactive model (TRIF), tabulated presumed PDF approach (TPPDF), and the tabulated flamelet progress variable approach (TFPV). The results proved that the TFPV model based on approximated diffusion flamelets [31][32][33] performs better in the description of spray flames due to the consideration of turbulence-chemistry interaction and local distribution of scalar dissipation rate, which has also been comprehensively validated by authors in the modeling of spray flames with single and double injections [34,35], as well as light-and heavy-duty Diesel engines [29,36,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results from these methods are reported in Figure 5, together with experimental data, showing the value from the PLV approach with a threshold value of 2e-6 is very close to the measurement. Such achieved accuracy is adequate for proceeding to combustion simulations and further validation of the numerical setup was reported in [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Techniques that fall into this category include the flame-generated manifold (FGM) [16], the flame prolongation of ILDM (FPI) [17] or the flamelet progress variable (FPV) [18]. Among them, one interesting approach, the tabulated flamelet progress variable (TFPV) based on approximated diffusion flamelets [19,20,21], has been comprehensively validated in the modeling of spray flames with single and double injections [22,23], as well as light-and heavy-duty Diesel engines [24,25]. The successful application of the TFPV approach in the presence of multiple injections shows that it should potentially be able to capture lean-rich premixed and diffusion flames as well as auto-ignition modes of combustion, simultaneously [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%