2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational modeling of size-dependent superelasticity of shape memory alloys

Abstract: The superelastic effect in shape memory alloys (SMAs) is attributed to the stressinduced reversible austenitic-martensitic phase transformations. It is characterized by the development of significant strains which are fully recoverable upon unloading, and also characterized by the stress-hysteresis in the loading and unloading cycle which corresponds to the energy dissipated during phase transformations. Recently, experiments have revealed size-dependent effects in the superelastic responses of SMAs at micro-a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where subscripts A and M denote austenitic phase and martensitic phase, respectively. The hardening modulus P tr have been introduced by several authors (Qiao and Radovitzky, 2016;Tabesh et al, 2017;Yu et al, 2018b). Based on the observation of stress plateau in San Juan et al (2008), Qiao and Radovitzky (2016) ignored the influence of hardening modulus, that is, P tr is set to a value of zero.…”
Section: Transformation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where subscripts A and M denote austenitic phase and martensitic phase, respectively. The hardening modulus P tr have been introduced by several authors (Qiao and Radovitzky, 2016;Tabesh et al, 2017;Yu et al, 2018b). Based on the observation of stress plateau in San Juan et al (2008), Qiao and Radovitzky (2016) ignored the influence of hardening modulus, that is, P tr is set to a value of zero.…”
Section: Transformation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardening modulus P tr have been introduced by several authors (Qiao and Radovitzky, 2016;Tabesh et al, 2017;Yu et al, 2018b). Based on the observation of stress plateau in San Juan et al (2008), Qiao and Radovitzky (2016) ignored the influence of hardening modulus, that is, P tr is set to a value of zero. Tabesh et al (2017) adopted a classic transformation hardening rule in the proposed gradient-based constitutive model.…”
Section: Transformation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At points A, B, C, D, deformations are assigned as a percentage, stressin Gpa. Table 1 gives experimental data obtained in papers [3,4]. If we unload the sample at the stress that corresponds to point C in the diagram, part of deformation (an elastic component of the overall deformation of the model) will disappear.…”
Section: Defining Correlations In the Theory Of Thermo-elastoplasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, the nonlocal strain gradient theory has been extensively used to study the size-dependent behaviors of small scaled structures, such as the static and dynamic analyses of micro or nano rods (Li et al, 2016), beams (Barati et al, 2019;Esfahani et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019), tubes (Farajpour et al, 2019;Mohammadian et al, 2019), and plates (Babu and Patel, 2019;Lu et al, 2019). In addition to microscopic experimental research of SMA, Qiao and Radovitzky (2016), Qiao et al (2011) proposed a nonlocal continuum model, in which an energetic length scale and a dissipative length scale are introduced, to describe the size-dependent superelastic response in recent experiments of SMAs. And then, Qiao and Radovitzky (2013) proposed a numerical model supporting the previously proposed explanation that the external Ti oxide layer may be responsible for the loss of superelasticity in the small pillars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%