2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational modelling of bone cement polymerization: Temperature and residual stresses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cement residual stresses were computed by reducing the temperature of the cement mantle uniformly; this is a simplification of reality, as has been observed experimentally 38 and computationally. 23,44 Bone resorption due to stress shielding was not taken into account, which may also influence the debonding of the bone-cement interface at least in the short-term. 2 Most of the stress shielding effect took place during the first year after implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cement residual stresses were computed by reducing the temperature of the cement mantle uniformly; this is a simplification of reality, as has been observed experimentally 38 and computationally. 23,44 Bone resorption due to stress shielding was not taken into account, which may also influence the debonding of the bone-cement interface at least in the short-term. 2 Most of the stress shielding effect took place during the first year after implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology proposed includes not only damage of bone-cement interface and cement, but also the residual stresses produced during cement polymerization. 23,38,44 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…21 The Cartesian coordinate system components x, y and z directions were along the body direction of medial to lateral, posterior to anterior and distal to proximal directions, respectively. The femur was fixed at the end (femoral end at the knee joint), [22][23][24] and perfect bonding was considered between the bone and cement. 22,23,25 Here, the interaction between the femoral prosthesis and cement was defined as surface-to-surface contact with a small sliding and friction coefficient of 0.3.…”
Section: Boundary Conditions Of Implanted Femurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The femur was fixed at the end (femoral end at the knee joint), [22][23][24] and perfect bonding was considered between the bone and cement. 22,23,25 Here, the interaction between the femoral prosthesis and cement was defined as surface-to-surface contact with a small sliding and friction coefficient of 0.3. 20,22,23,25 Mesh property of implanted femur…”
Section: Boundary Conditions Of Implanted Femurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical algorithms have been developed to describe the temperature evolution during the cure process (Baliga et al, 1992;Borzacchiello et al, 1998;Gilbert, 2006). However, to date only a few studies have simulated the curing process in order to establish the initial stress state (Jeffers et al, 2007;Lennon and Prendergast 2002;Nuno and Avanzolini 2002;Briscoe and New 2010;Perez et al, 2009). Bone cement is a visco-elastic material (Verdonschot and Huiskes 1994;Jeffers et al, 2005) and this will lead to stress relaxation in the first few hours or days, further altering the initial stress state.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Initial Mechanical Environment Of The Bonementioning
confidence: 99%