Computational Models of Brain and Behavior 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9781119159193.ch17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Models in Social Neuroscience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implicit and explicit signals thus both play a role in decisions to trust. Increases in the use of computational modeling approaches (Kishida and Montague, 2012; Cheong et al, 2017) may shed light on the interaction between these different types of signals. One hypothesis suggests that a choice to place trust in another is not static, but rather dynamically evolves over time as we update initial implicit appraisals of others with explicitly experienced patterns of reciprocity (Chang et al, 2010) using associative mechanisms that enable learning the value of a partner on a trial-by-trial basis (Rescorla and Wagner, 1972).…”
Section: Decisions To Trust Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implicit and explicit signals thus both play a role in decisions to trust. Increases in the use of computational modeling approaches (Kishida and Montague, 2012; Cheong et al, 2017) may shed light on the interaction between these different types of signals. One hypothesis suggests that a choice to place trust in another is not static, but rather dynamically evolves over time as we update initial implicit appraisals of others with explicitly experienced patterns of reciprocity (Chang et al, 2010) using associative mechanisms that enable learning the value of a partner on a trial-by-trial basis (Rescorla and Wagner, 1972).…”
Section: Decisions To Trust Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, adjusting behaviour requires expectations to be updated in response to new information. Updating of expectations in social environments can be captured by reinforcement learning (RL) models (e.g., [28][29][30], in which learning is driven by differences between expected and received rewards (i.e., prediction errors). Adolescence is characterized by substantial improvements in flexible learning and quick adaptation to novel non-social contexts ( [31][32][33]; whether this extends to the social domain, however, is still unclear (but see 34 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in the field of social neuroscience have begun to apply these models to understand how and whether quantities predicted by RL are represented in the brain during social situations (Behrens et al, 2008;Hampton et al, 2008;Burke et al, 2010;Suzuki et al, 2012;Seo et al, 2014;Apps et al, 2015;Hackel et al, 2015;Sul et al, 2015;Kumaran et al, 2016;Lockwood et al, 2016;Spiers et al, 2016;Wittmann et al, 2016;Zaki et al, 2016;Cheong et al, 2017;Hill et al, 2017;Charpentier and O'Doherty, 2018;Konovalov et al, 2018;Lindström et al, 2018;Wittmann et al, 2018;Yoon et al, 2018;Farmer et al, 2019;Lockwood et al, 2019). The implementation of these models has already provided important new insights into multiple aspects of social behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%