2018
DOI: 10.1364/boe.9.006477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational multifocal microscopy

Abstract: Despite recent advances, high performance single-shot 3D microscopy remains an elusive task. By introducing designed diffractive optical elements (DOEs), one is capable of converting a microscope into a 3D "kaleidoscope", in which case the snapshot image consists of an array of tiles and each tile focuses on different depths. However, the acquired multifocal microscopic (MFM) image suffers from multiple sources of degradation, which prevents MFM from further applications. We propose a unifying computational fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our multifocus imaging strategy offers several notable advantages over alternative strategies. Compared to techniques using a DOE [29][30][31] , our z-splitter prism is low cost, easy to design and assemble, does not require the addition of a chromatic corrector, and can be adapted to a variety of imaging modalities. Compared to techniques that also involve the use of beamsplitting optics 24,25,27,28 , our system requires only a single camera and enables significantly larger FOV while offering the flexibility of swapping in different z-splitters to accommodate different imaging speed or volume requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our multifocus imaging strategy offers several notable advantages over alternative strategies. Compared to techniques using a DOE [29][30][31] , our z-splitter prism is low cost, easy to design and assemble, does not require the addition of a chromatic corrector, and can be adapted to a variety of imaging modalities. Compared to techniques that also involve the use of beamsplitting optics 24,25,27,28 , our system requires only a single camera and enables significantly larger FOV while offering the flexibility of swapping in different z-splitters to accommodate different imaging speed or volume requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, examples of such devices include specially fabricated beam splitters (using two cameras 27,28 ) or diffractive optical elements (DOEs) [29][30][31][32] . These usually involve significant design and manufacturing challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique, termed "multifocus microscopy" (MFM), allows for a simpler optical configuration, employing just a single camera, but the MFG introduces chromatic aberration, which degrades performance and/or restricts spectral bandwidth, 42 although this can be mitigated using computational techniques. 43 A key benefit of MUM is that it can also be used to image extended objects, 41,44 whereas the emphasis for PSF-engineering has been on localization of PSFs that are the images of pointlike objects. 45,46 There is also the opportunity to use MUM/MFM in combination with engineered PSFs for even better localization precision, as has been done using an astigmatic PSF [47][48][49] and an Airy-beam-based PSF.…”
Section: A Multifocal-plane Microscopy (Mum)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our paper investigates the temporal upsampling problem. While previous approaches investigate in the framework of compressive sensing [1,14,17,26,35,38,41], we formulate our work as fusing event streams with intensity images to obtain a temporally dense video. Compared to existing literature [36] which integrates event counts per pixel across time, our differentiable model utilizes "tanh" functions as event activation units and imposes sparsity constraints on both spatial and temporal domain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%