2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational performance of a parallelized three-dimensional high-order spectral element toolbox

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the LW-ACM was carefully validated in [3], no high-resolution validation study of the LW-ACM has been published so far to the best of our knowledge. For this purpose, we generated highly accurate reference data of the lid-driven cubic cavity at Reynolds number Re = 2000, using a spectral and mortar element analysis program developed using the OpenSPECULOOS toolbox [1,5]. We performed the simulation on 8 3 elements with Gauss-Lobato-Legendre polynomials of degree 12 and a dimensionless time step duration of 10 −3 .…”
Section: Reference Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the LW-ACM was carefully validated in [3], no high-resolution validation study of the LW-ACM has been published so far to the best of our knowledge. For this purpose, we generated highly accurate reference data of the lid-driven cubic cavity at Reynolds number Re = 2000, using a spectral and mortar element analysis program developed using the OpenSPECULOOS toolbox [1,5]. We performed the simulation on 8 3 elements with Gauss-Lobato-Legendre polynomials of degree 12 and a dimensionless time step duration of 10 −3 .…”
Section: Reference Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the CG solver (without a sophisticated pre-conditioner), the number of iterations required to achieve convergence (close to machine zero) is proportional to the initial residue and the cubic root of the total number of unknowns [25]. Remarking that the initial residue is proportional to the time step size, thus…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is considered very good scalability if a linear (ideal) speedup is obtained, i.e., S p = p. In practical tests, T 1 is sometimes replaced by n 0 Á T n 0 , where T n 0 is the execution time while the parallel code is running on a small number of processes (n 0 ) [25]. Two tests are conducted in this work: a problem with the mesh size of 32 3 running on 3-63 processes and a problem with the mesh size of 256 3 running on 127-2047 processes.…”
Section: D Lid-driven Cavity Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This opens the door for fully explicit time integration schemes and is a well-known property of GLL basis functions in conjunction with Gauss-Lobatto quadrature [1,20,32,[47][48][49].Collocation methods that use the Kronecker ı property of Gauss-Lobatto nodes in conjunction with corresponding nodal basis functions are not new, and many instantiations of this concept have been developed under different names in the past, for example, the C 0 -collocation-Galerkin method [50-53], the differential quadrature method [54,55], the Galerkin/spectral element methods with numerical integration [11,12,56], multidomain spectral or pseudospectral elements [12,31,32,36,57], or hp-FEM with Gauss-Lobatto basis functions [58,59]. Beyond the straightforward implementation of collocated FEA advocated in the present paper, advanced implementation technologies for collocation methods have been developed, which are documented in particular in the spectral element literature [11,12,20,32,48,60,61]. In this context, we would be very happy if the presented material implicitly triggered the interest of standard finite element analysts in collocation type methods that have reached a very mature state in spectral elements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the C 0 -collocation-Galerkin method [50][51][52][53], the differential quadrature method [54,55], the G-NI or SEM-NI methods (Galerkin/spectral element methods with numerical integration) [11,12,56], multidomain spectral or pseudospectral elements [12,31,32,36,57] or hp-FEM with Gauss-Lobatto basis functions [58,59]. Beyond the straightforward implementation of hp-collocation advocated in the present paper, advanced implementation technologies for collocation methods have been developed, which are documented in particular in the spectral element literature [11,12,20,32,48,60,61]. In this context, we would be very happy if the presented material implicitly triggered the interest of standard finite element analysts in collocation type methods that have reached a very mature state in spectral elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%