58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 2017
DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-1814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Results for the KTH-NASA Wind-Tunnel Model Used for Acquisition of Transonic Nonlinear Aeroelastic Data

Abstract: A status report is provided on the collaboration between the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Sweden and the NASA Langley Research Center regarding the aeroelastic analyses of a full-span fighter configuration wind-tunnel model. This wind-tunnel model was tested in the Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT) in the summer of 2016. Large amounts of data were acquired including steady/unsteady pressures, accelerations, strains, and measured dynamic deformations. The aeroelastic analyses presented include linear ae… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 11 shows the wind-tunnel model installed in the TDT. Using the AEROM software, aeroelastic root locus plots were generated for the KTH wind-tunnel model in air test medium for a free-air case and a solution accounting for the effects of the TDT test section via CFD modeling [33,34], as can be seen in Figure 12. There were three configurations tested: wing with tip stores (configuration 1), wing with tip and under-wing stores (configuration 2), and wing with tip and under-wing stores with added masses at tip stores (configuration 3).…”
Section: Kth Generic Fightermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 11 shows the wind-tunnel model installed in the TDT. Using the AEROM software, aeroelastic root locus plots were generated for the KTH wind-tunnel model in air test medium for a free-air case and a solution accounting for the effects of the TDT test section via CFD modeling [33,34], as can be seen in Figure 12. There were three configurations tested: wing with tip stores (configuration 1), wing with tip and under-wing stores (configuration 2), and wing with tip and under-wing stores with added masses at tip stores (configuration 3).…”
Section: Kth Generic Fightermentioning
confidence: 99%