2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational timeline reconstruction of the stories surrounding Trump: Story turbulence, narrative control, and collective chronopathy

Abstract: Measuring the specific kind, temporal ordering, diversity, and turnover rate of stories surrounding any given subject is essential to developing a complete reckoning of that subject’s historical impact. Here, we use Twitter as a distributed news and opinion aggregation source to identify and track the dynamics of the dominant day-scale stories around Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States. Working with a data set comprising around 20 billion 1-grams, we first compare each day’s 1-gram and 2-gram… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, detected stories are separate contexts which could otherwise be considered the same topic. For example, story detection applied to Donald Trump's twitter timeline can distinguish withinparty arguments from between-party arguments, which both belong to the topic of federal US politics (Dodds et al 2021). Another example applies story detection to the Twitter discussion following the police killing of Michael Brown (Srijith et al 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, detected stories are separate contexts which could otherwise be considered the same topic. For example, story detection applied to Donald Trump's twitter timeline can distinguish withinparty arguments from between-party arguments, which both belong to the topic of federal US politics (Dodds et al 2021). Another example applies story detection to the Twitter discussion following the police killing of Michael Brown (Srijith et al 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our methodology (for details, see “ Materials and methods ”) draws on a long history of research on the language of politics and its function in democracies 15 – 18 . For instance, prior work has used records of spoken and written political language to establish the prevalence of negative language among political extremists 19 ; to quantify growing partisanship and polarization 20 , as well as displayed happiness 21 , among US Congress members; to analyze political leaders’ psychological attributes such as certainty and analytical thinking 22 ; to quantify the turbulence of Trump’s presidency 23 ; or to measure the effect of linguistic features on the success of US presidential candidates 24 and on public approval of US Congress 25 . A combination of political discourse analysis and psychological measurement tools has further been applied to obtain insights into the personality traits and sentiments of politicians in general 26 , 27 , as well Donald Trump in particular 28 – 31 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%