“…Subsequently, the 13 C NMR calculations of (1 R *, 3 S *, 4 R *, 5 S *, 6 S *, 7 S *, 10 S *, 21 R *, 15 R *, 16 S *) -1a and (1 R *, 3 R *, 4 S *, 5 S *, 6 S *, 7 S *, 10 S *, 21 R *, 15 R *, 16 S *) -1b were carried out using the GIAO method at mPW1PW91-SCRF/6–311+G (d, p)/PCM (MeOH). The results of the DP4+ probability analysis ( Smith and Goodman, 2010 ; Kawazoe et al, 2020 ; Xu et al, 2021 ) showed that 1a was the most likely candidate structure, with a better correlation coefficient ( R 2 = 0.99891) and a high DP4+ probability of 100% (all data) probability ( Figure 4 ). Similarly, 13 C NMR calculations with the DP4+ probability analysis of the two isomers [(1 R *, 3 S *, 4 S *, 5 S *, 6 S *, 7 S *, 10 S *, 21 R *, 15 R *, 16S*) -2a and (1 R *, 3 R *, 4 R *, 5 S *, 6 S *, 7 S *, 10 S *, 21 R *, 15 R *, 16 S *)- 2b ] of 2 were performed.…”