2017
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computationally Efficient Combination of Multi‐channel Phase Data From Multi‐echo Acquisitions (ASPIRE)

Abstract: MCPC-3D-S is an improvement over prior multi-echo methods, which is useful if the ASPIRE echo time condition cannot be fulfilled. ASPIRE is a particularly fast and robust approach that runs on the scanner's reconstructor in a small fraction of the acquisition time. Magn Reson Med 79:2996-3006, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
88
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although B 0 ‐maps are originally generated from the 2 TE phase images, we can reconstruct B 0 ‐maps from the single phase images after subtracting pre‐stored, coil‐dependent phase offsets . These are calculated using ASPIRE from a dual‐echo EPI reference pre‐scan whose parameters matched those of the se‐vNavs listed below, except for the dual‐echo TE 1 /TE 2 of 7/14 ms (ASPIRE requires TE 2 = 2 × TE 1 ). The remaining processing pipeline (update calculation, feedback sending) is identical to the original pipeline (Figure C).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although B 0 ‐maps are originally generated from the 2 TE phase images, we can reconstruct B 0 ‐maps from the single phase images after subtracting pre‐stored, coil‐dependent phase offsets . These are calculated using ASPIRE from a dual‐echo EPI reference pre‐scan whose parameters matched those of the se‐vNavs listed below, except for the dual‐echo TE 1 /TE 2 of 7/14 ms (ASPIRE requires TE 2 = 2 × TE 1 ). The remaining processing pipeline (update calculation, feedback sending) is identical to the original pipeline (Figure C).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…normalΔ B 0 maps were obtained using the same 3D gradient echo sequence with the following parameters: FOV = 220 mm × 192.5 mm, slice thickness = 1.7 mm, matrix size = 128 × 112 × 80, nominal voxel size = 1.7 × 1.7 × 1.7 mm 3 , GRAPPA = 2, TR = 18.0 ms, TE 1 = 3 ms, and TE 2 = 6 ms. Only TE 3 was B 0 ‐dependent: TE 3,1.5T = 14 ms, TE 3,3T = 12 ms, TE 3,7T = 10 ms, and TE 3,9.4T = 9.5 ms to account for faster phase evolution at higher B 0 . Multichannel data were combined using the ASPIRE coil combination . Phase wraps were unwrapped using UMPIRE, and the Δ B 0 maps were calculated from the difference between phase images .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multichannel data were combined using the ASPIRE coil combination. 28 Phase wraps were unwrapped using UMPIRE, 29 and the ΔB 0 maps were calculated from the difference between phase images. 30,31 Fat maps were measured only once, on the 3T Prisma, using a turbo spin echo-based Dixon method 32 with the same spatial resolution: FOV = 220 mm × 192.5 mm, slice thickness = 1.72 mm, matrix size = 128 × 112 × 80, nominal voxel size = 1.7 × 1.7 × 1.7 mm 3 , TR = 6090 ms, and TE = 14 ms. 3D T 1 -weighted MPRAGE 33 or MP2RAGE 34 were acquired for anatomic reference and to generate brain masks.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and subsequently unwrapped via fast 2D phase unwrapping available at https://github.com/mfkasim91/unwrap_phase/. The phase offset maps required for the method CEST‐GRE‐1TE were masked and smoothed using a discretized spline smoother [MATLAB function smoothn.m] to provide reliable results even at the brain’s boundaries, as has been shown previously for coil combination and distortion correction . Finally, as the ∆ B 0 maps were not masked, they were smoothed by a spatial Hamming filter before being used for CEST correction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%