2019
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of spatial resolution on the spectral quality and quantification accuracy of whole‐brain MRSI at 1.5T, 3T, 7T, and 9.4T

Abstract: Purpose Inhomogeneities in the static magnetic field ( B 0 ) deteriorate MRSI data quality by lowering the spectral resolution and SNR. MRSI with low spatial resolution is also prone to lipid bleeding. These problems are increasingly problematic at ultra‐high fields. An approach to tackling these challenges independent of B 0 ‐shim hardware is to increase the spatial resolution. Therefore, we investigated the effec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…AC/DC shimming provided a significant reduction (29%) in spectral linewidth and an increase (31%) in SNR, which resulted in improved accuracy for metabolite quantification by smaller (22%) Cramer-Rao lower bounds. While local homogeneity might be improved by smaller voxels with high resolution MRSI 58 , such acquisitions may not always be possible due to SNR constraints for low concentration metabolites (GABA, GSH), and better shimming may also improve high resolution data. On the other hand, challenges for water suppression and spectral editing due to global inhomogeneity do not change with image resolution and cannot be corrected with post-processing B 0 correction methods 24 , hence requiring better shimming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AC/DC shimming provided a significant reduction (29%) in spectral linewidth and an increase (31%) in SNR, which resulted in improved accuracy for metabolite quantification by smaller (22%) Cramer-Rao lower bounds. While local homogeneity might be improved by smaller voxels with high resolution MRSI 58 , such acquisitions may not always be possible due to SNR constraints for low concentration metabolites (GABA, GSH), and better shimming may also improve high resolution data. On the other hand, challenges for water suppression and spectral editing due to global inhomogeneity do not change with image resolution and cannot be corrected with post-processing B 0 correction methods 24 , hence requiring better shimming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signal excitation and slab selection were performed in the same way for both SO and SOI readouts and included the following components (Fig. 1): 1) fat suppression with inversion recovery using an asymmetric adiabatic hypergeometric (HGSB) pulse 22 and 270 msec delay for lipid nulling; 2) adiabatic spin‐echo sequence (ASE) 22 with an excitation hyperbolic secant adiabatic half passage pulse (HS8 modulation; duration = 4 msec; bandwidth = 5 kHz; B 1+,max = 6 μT) and a pair of gradient offset‐independent adiabatic refocusing pulses (GOIA‐W 16,4 ) 23 modulation (duration = 5 msec; bandwidth = 20 kHz; B 1,max = 16 μT); and 3) water suppression with a four‐pulse water suppression enhanced through T 1 effects (WET) module of 160 msec total duration which was optimized for 7T.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WET module used Gauss pulses of 150 Hz bandwidth, flip angles of 83.6°, 99.7°, 74.7°, and 160°, and 40‐msec interpulse delays. Frequency and slice selection profiles of the HGSB, AHP‐HS8, and GOIA‐W 16,4 pulses are shown in Fig. 2(a‐c).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations