2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/8071869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computationally Efficient Optimal Control for Unstable Power System Models

Abstract: In this article, the focus is mainly on gaining the optimal control for the unstable power system models and stabilizing them through the Riccati-based feedback stabilization process with sparsity-preserving techniques. We are to find the solution of the Continuous-time Algebraic Riccati Equations (CAREs) governed from the unstable power system models derived from the Brazilian Inter-Connected Power System (BIPS) models, which are large-scale sparse index-1 descriptor systems. We propose the projection-based R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyze the stability of the interpolation method, the local truncation error (LTE) and global error (GE) for states S 1 and S 2 can be considered [31]. For Systems 1 and 2, the LTE can be expressed as Equation ( 16):…”
Section: Efficiency Improvement Analysis and Interpolation Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze the stability of the interpolation method, the local truncation error (LTE) and global error (GE) for states S 1 and S 2 can be considered [31]. For Systems 1 and 2, the LTE can be expressed as Equation ( 16):…”
Section: Efficiency Improvement Analysis and Interpolation Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C satisfying the Wilson conditions. (1) Construct the Sylvester equations defned in (25) and solve for X and Y, respectively.…”
Section: H 2 Norm Of the Error System For The Romsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For solving the Riccati equation without explicit estimation of the ROM, some techniques are available in practice, for example, low-rank alternative direction implicit (LR-ADI), integrated Newton-Kleinman (NK) method, and Krylov subspace associated rational Krylov subspace method (RKSM). Tose methods are derived and analyzed in detail in references [22][23][24][25] and references therein. Te Newton-Kleinman method is a very complex approach and at each Newton step, LR-ADI iterations need to be executed once, which is a very time-laborious task [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BT method requires highly time-demanding computation steps with gigantic memory allotment because of the simulation of large dimensional Lyapunov equations, whereas IRKA is comparatively cheaper in computation cost but the stability of the reduced-order matrices is uncertain and there exists no error bound. On the other hand, some more approaches are available where the reduced-order matrices are used implicitly without storing and any suitable matrix factorization techniques are applied to find approximated factored solution of the Riccati equation of the target models, such as, Low-Rank Alternative Direction Implicit (LR-ADI) incorporated Newton-Kleniman (NK) method [27][28][29][30] and system-specific priori-based Rational Krylov Subspace Method (RKSM) [31][32][33][34]. Newton-Kleinman method consists of the time-consuming multi-layer nested iterative approach but no rigid convergence criteria of this method are well-defined and definiteness of the solution matrix is unrestrained, whereas RKSM is more functional for matrix-vector operations and well-suited for symmetric systems but the essence of adjustable shift parameter and lack of proper convergence measure makes it incompetent for the simulations of the Navier-Stokes models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%