2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2011.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-aided analysis of transrectal ultrasound images of the prostate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, TRUS has poor visual interpretation and cannot accurately identify the tumour area. Gomez-Ferrer and Arlandis [ 25 ] found only 12.6% hypoechoic lesions in their work, which were found in most (68%) benign tissues. These data confirm the need to try to analyze transrectal ultrasound images with computer assistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, TRUS has poor visual interpretation and cannot accurately identify the tumour area. Gomez-Ferrer and Arlandis [ 25 ] found only 12.6% hypoechoic lesions in their work, which were found in most (68%) benign tissues. These data confirm the need to try to analyze transrectal ultrasound images with computer assistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, this research method is only suitable for use when data are scarce. Gomez-Ferrer and Arlandis [ 25 ] recorded 288 cases of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy and extracted three still images from the biopsy area. The texture features of ultrasonic images are obtained by “simple mapping” on grey and spatial grey correlation matrices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%